Chat GPT AI

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Aldarion

Egg Nazi
9,722
26,646
I got audited the first year I filed schedule C. After sending them 5 fucking hundred pages of documentation, they gave me every penny plus interest.

Now it just feels like a game. Whats the worst theyre gonna do, audit me? oh no
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,674
If you want job security get into a field that nothing or very little is written down and instead goes by word of mouth. I am " on retainer" for lack of a better phrase because I ask questions, make notes in the field and talk to old timers like my dad about how they did things you can't see that are inside a furnace, under insulation on a vessel and such. I get paid often to "take a guess" at what is there they can't see.
We call this "tribal knowledge". My chief designer understood this well. Whenever I asked him about a part design he would just tap his head and say "Its all up here".
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,674
Yeah. I'm pretty aggressive with my schedule C. I've never been fully audited but I'm 5 for 5 on arguing with the IRS about various things and up mid-5 figures as a result. As long as what you're doing isn't totally beyond the pale and you have some kind of documentation they tend to roll over.
Nah, its about politics. Notice with the exception of California, blue states audits are nearly non-existent. Imagine a state the size of NY being this low on the audit list.

1686240415914.png
 
  • 1WTF
  • 1Clown World
Reactions: 1 users

Pasteton

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,733
1,919
Akshually if you look at Cali the highly densely populated blue areas aren’t audited as much either, it looks like the auditing is happening all in the red parts of Cali (by just area, cali is more red than blue I believe).
Source of this map? I have a feeling this is more to do with wealth and influence than politics. Going after some finance bigwig on the coasts means guaranteed lawyers and pushback which the irs doesn’t have the resources /is way too lazy to deal with. But that small business owner in a flyover city? Can make him roll right over
 

Pasteton

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,733
1,919
And then the Midwest dead zone I’m guessing is because it’s mostly apocalyptic and opioid based economies there , nothing worth pursuing
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,674
Akshually if you look at Cali the highly densely populated blue areas aren’t audited as much either, it looks like the auditing is happening all in the red parts of Cali (by just area, cali is more red than blue I believe).
Source of this map? I have a feeling this is more to do with wealth and influence than politics. Going after some finance bigwig on the coasts means guaranteed lawyers and pushback which the irs doesn’t have the resources /is way too lazy to deal with. But that small business owner in a flyover city? Can make him roll right over
 

Captain Suave

Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
5,253
8,953

Rather than politics, this is reflective of auditing people receiving assistance in various forms. Seems like we should be happy about that. From your link:

"The five counties with the highest audit rates are all predominantly African American, rural counties in the Deep South. The audit rate is also very high in South Texas’ largely Hispanic counties and in counties with Native American reservations, such as in South Dakota. Primarily poor, white counties, such as those in eastern Kentucky in Appalachia, also have elevated audit rates."

Audits are lower in areas where people file straight 1040's and pay from withholding. No surprise.
 

Furry

🌭🍔🇺🇦✌️SLAVA UKRAINI!✌️🇺🇦🍔🌭
<Gold Donor>
21,885
28,606
I just file and do the default deduction every year except one where I had a viral video that made me a ton of money. Deducted a bunch of electronics and travel expenses and paid 0$ in taxes on that money. Thought for sure it’d be my one audit, but nothing happened.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,495
120,674
Rather than politics, this is reflective of auditing people receiving assistance in various forms. Seems like we should be happy about that. From your link:

"The five counties with the highest audit rates are all predominantly African American, rural counties in the Deep South. The audit rate is also very high in South Texas’ largely Hispanic counties and in counties with Native American reservations, such as in South Dakota. Primarily poor, white counties, such as those in eastern Kentucky in Appalachia, also have elevated audit rates."

Audits are lower in areas where people file straight 1040's and pay from withholding. No surprise.
There are a metric fuck ton of people receiving assistance in NY. Similarly their are a metric fuck ton of African Americans in NY.
 

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,358
80,737
you are looking at it with a flat line of progression when it is going to be more of a hockey curve upwards.
Tech doesn't really follow a hockey stick. It's more like two hockey sticks where the top one is inverted. Or more specifically, a sigmoid curve.

image-4.png


This curve naturally occurs due to physical limitations. Sometimes a new approach or material is discovered that allows the creation of an another sigmoid curve to reach higher.

In the case of many AI topics, this is because there are limitations to certain AI approaches that start to logarithmically slow down improvements before a critical threshold of usability can be reached. It's confusing to see a massive exponential growth followed by a slowing of improvement, but that's just the nature of it.

You can observe that with object detection from images. Where depending on the image database, getting to 80-90% accuracy happened quickly. Getting to 99% accuracy may need an entirely different technology other than the type of convolution networks.


1686326274016.png



1686326293709.png
 
  • 5Like
Reactions: 4 users

Tuco

I got Tuco'd!
<Gold Donor>
47,358
80,737
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,510
41,249
Tech doesn't really follow a hockey stick. It's more like two hockey sticks where the top one is inverted. Or more specifically, a sigmoid curve.

image-4.png


This curve naturally occurs due to physical limitations. Sometimes a new approach or material is discovered that allows the creation of an another sigmoid curve to reach higher.

In the case of many AI topics, this is because there are limitations to certain AI approaches that start to logarithmically slow down improvements before a critical threshold of usability can be reached. It's confusing to see a massive exponential growth followed by a slowing of improvement, but that's just the nature of it.

You can observe that with object detection from images. Where depending on the image database, getting to 80-90% accuracy happened quickly. Getting to 99% accuracy may need an entirely different technology other than the type of convolution networks.


View attachment 477297


View attachment 477298

Yes I was discussing this issue the other day and also noted that holistically, the trend is to find utility for surplus capacity which further cannibalizes the prospect for advancements. Which is to say scope creep is real and endemic, diluting anything as soon as it reaches a point where it has economic utility.

E.g. Open AI spends significant resources filtering data and training its models to not be racist, which is not to the benefit of the core model development rather than religious adherence.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Gold Donor>
31,197
23,355
Yes I was discussing this issue the other day and also noted that holistically, the trend is to find utility for surplus capacity which further cannibalizes the prospect for advancements. Which is to say scope creep is real and endemic, diluting anything as soon as it reaches a point where it has economic utility.

E.g. Open AI spends significant resources filtering data and training its models to not be racist, which is not to the benefit of the core model development rather than religious adherence.
You don't understand the architecture of these models.

The layers that screen out things like racism are not the core model. Core model training is just a statistical model of word order. The core model is only built once, during the training run, and then it is one giant terabyte+ long number, until a new model is built in the next training run with a new, larger base training set.

The alignment layers are much higher up the stack than the core model, applying human feedback training. These alignment layers are constantly being adjusted through use, but the core model remains fixed. You could throw out, or replace, that layer, and apply a different layer in its place, and it would change the output but it would not change the core model.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Palum

what Suineg set it to
26,510
41,249
You don't understand the architecture of these models.

The layers that screen out things like racism are not the core model. Core model training is just a statistical model of word order. The core model is only built once, during the training run, and then it is one giant terabyte+ long number, until a new model is built in the next training run with a new, larger base training set.

The alignment layers are much higher up the stack than the core model, applying human feedback training. These alignment layers are constantly being adjusted through use, but the core model remains fixed. You could throw out, or replace, that layer, and apply a different layer in its place, and it would change the output but it would not change the core model.
Yes you didn't understand my post