You are the one who has the unique skill set. You also don't need to yell. It's much more effective to speak gently when you are wielding the hammer. If your director is the one shooting at you, just ask him if he wants the work done or not. His job is to shield you from that sort of shit, not be the source of it. If he's not going to do his job, then you don't need to feel bad about not doing yours.Yeah I mean we just laid off thousands of people. I start yelling at my director and I'm next
I was in a similar position and did both for ~4 years until I wanted better work life balance.Question for you folks.
I've been with a company as a remote worker for 3 years now. No timesheets, hardly any work, good job security, great pay ($150k+). I recently was told to find a new role in the company and since I couldn't find anything, I invented one, and they were ok with it.
During that time I interviewed elsewhere and got an offer that was also remote, with same pay, however they have daily timesheets, and the company does a lot of work for the government (although I will not be working on those contracts).
Question is - do you think the risk is worth doing both for some time? I calculated that in 3 years this would add about $400k to my networth. When I turn 40 this is the difference between having a networth of $800k as opposed to $1.2mil.
At this point in my life, more money doesn't do much for me except allow for more investments. In the near term this second job would just allow me to pay off my car loan which is about $55k @ 4%.
I was in a similar position and did both for ~4 years until I wanted better work life balance.
It can be done.
Weigh the risks yourself.Did you have timesheets? I'm curious, if caught, if this constitutes timesheet fraud by default.
I work specifically in data infrastructure.My previous career has been eliminated due to outsourcing/AI so I'm pivoting to IT. Starting with support and hoping to move into databases as fast as I can.
It sounds like I picked the wrong field if I'm trying to avoid getting replaced by outsourcing/AI again.
I work specifically in data infrastructure.
Logic is simple. Will there be less or more data tomorrow?
this. most companies have accreted decades of bad design. you arent getting replaced by AI in this spiderweb of shit most places haveLess than others as no two companies use the exact same metrics or sources to derive them. It's not something that can be directly replaced by AI. Which would fill nuts and bolts development in places but not the fundamental understanding of it.
The industry is definitely going through some turmoil
So much this. Plus the executive culture pushing for this shit do not have the faintest idea of the costs and effort of adopting AI, let alone of its capabilities and limitatiions. They just see the second coming of outsourcing and a lot of companies are going to murder themselves like what happened in the early years of outsourcing.Heh, well the truth and reality are often wildly disconnected. It doesn't matter if the attempt will fail, the attempt will still be made. And that doesn't do any of us in this industry much good.
I'm sure all the same conversations were had by our contemporaries 40+ years ago when manufacturing was leaving this country. And now we have an administration pretending to give a shit about bringing manufacturing back while ignoring the next exodus right under their noses.