Snow tires

moseby_sl

shitlord
16
0
I have been shopping around for snows and rims for the last little bit as well as been doing some research on the net.

I have a quote for a set of michelin x-ice 3's, the next set they recommended was a set of Kumo's (didnt get the model name). My conundrum is there is there are $300 difference in price. I know some snows have a much shorter life span then others. I just want to know if it is worth it to get the x-ice3 or go with the less expensive tires.

Right now I drive about 500 km a week (that is all highway and to and from work) and live in southern Ontario where we do not see a ton of snow. That being said I plan on changing jobs in the next few months so will be driving, significantly less. Just wondering what peoples thoughts are on this matter?
 

Antarius

Lord Nagafen Raider
1,828
15
Well, I think we get a bit more snow on the south side of the lake, but I am 100% for getting a dedicated snow and ice traction tire. I used the Blizzak ws-60 in my EVO, the LM-25 in my bmw, and now the WS80 on my Audi... The difference between the WS (winter traction) series and the LM series (winter performance) was night and day... as big of a difference as switching from all season to winters, and from summers to all-season. If you want to have the confidence to drive 40+ mph in blizzard-like conditions, or even just driving 55-70 on snow covered roads with 100% confidence and safety, go for an x-ice3 or equivilent tire. Jesus though 300 dollars difference in price? Most likely they are ripping you off on the x-ice 3s. On a "normal" sedan size, 16-17inch winter rims, they run about 120 dollars each.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/tests/...ertesting=true

If you lived in like... Rural Virginia, Urban New York/Boston or like St Louis or something... Performance Winter would be an excellent option.

If you're buying rims, you should downsize your rims for winter, especially if you have like 18s, and your brake calipers are small enough to fit 17s or even 16s. The price difference can be hundreds of dollars. Unfortunately... you should have bought your tires about 5 months ago... tire places tend to gouge their prices this time of year when people start panicking after they realize those bald ass tires on their beaters are completely unsafe and they've already almost killed themselves a few times. Unfortunately some people DO kill themselves and others before learning that the time to put on winters is THE FIRST SNOWFALL.

But even then, there shouldn't be a 300 dollar difference in price, 400 for the rims is a set price (you don't have to get rims necessarily, just use your current stock rims and you pay a little more to remount and balance your tires each year, but if for example, you aren't going to keep the car at least 3 years it would work out in your favor... and say, 550 for the 4 quality tires. If they're saving you 300 between the 2 sets, something is fishy. Example, in the OE size for my car, tires are about 50 dollars more PER TIRE, 225/40/18, $183 for the Michelin $150 for dunlop winter max, but going to a 16" rim, which I can easily do on my car, The Dunlops Winter maxx are $99 a piece.


I'm not sure WHICH Kumhos they were trying to sell you, because Kumho in the U.S. doesn't even offer a winter tire, only all-seasons.
 

Lejina

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻
<Bronze Donator>
4,518
11,605
I used to have xice tires, the first gen. Despite being a super soft compound, they lasted a solid 5 years. I'm using hankook optimo 4s and it's a huge downgrade in winter and they seem to wear faster to boot. There was like a 400$ difference between the sets. The Michelin are pretty damn expensive but if you can afford them, they are worth every penny.

Antarius, you're thinking US pricing, we pay significantly more in Canada.
 

drmandolin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
2,137
5,902
Firestone Winterforce


Really happy with these. Good price point as well compared to others, and they are studdable if you really need to rally race to work.