supertouch_sl
shitlord
- 1,858
- 3
Jesus. More and more details about the parents are coming out. The guy was sexting minors the day his child died and they visited websites about living a child-free life. I hope these parents fry.
I read something about part of his search history being how to survive/get by in a prison sentence. So possibly thinking ahead but not planning on getting charged with doing it willfully.Stupid plan though because even if it is just negligence I think these people usually do some jail time.
Not only that but when the wife went to pick up the kid at day care they told her that he was never dropped off. "Ross must have left him in the car," she replied, according to Stoddard. Witnesses said they tried to tell her many other things could have happened, but Leanna Harris insisted that Ross Harris must have left the boy in the car, Stoddard said.I read something about part of his search history being how to survive/get by in a prison sentence. So possibly thinking ahead but not planning on getting charged with doing it willfully.
Supertouch, your thread title sucks dicks just like you.
I mean really, you're a dude, just go deadbeat. They seem to have been in this together though, so he wanted her to be with him I guess? Still, drop the fucker at one of your parents' house and never come back, LOL! But no..."great idea honey, we will never get caught, hear me out...."Should have taken a page from all Monica's and just left.
A justice system where nobody can be convicted with out a signed confession with 2 notaries and a judge present is way better. You're so much better than everyone else.Good luck proving intent unless he told someone or wrote something about it.
They can make 20 theories as to why he should have noticed his son in the car, that will not change the fact that the very definition of being distracted is 'not noticing things that you should notice'.
They can make 20 theories about the way he reacted to the death, that will not change the fact people react to traumatic event in totally different ways (even him trying to muster up fake tears at the police station can be brushed away as him seeing he is in trouble and trying to behave in the way he is expected to behave).
They can find 20 reasons as to why he was not a good husband, that will not change the fact that it is irrelevant for the case at hand.
I mean, even if he spent his days saying to whoever wanted to listen: 'I would be happier if my son was dead', they still would not be able to prove intent. I don't think I would want a justice system where a Freudian slip constitutes intent.
Who cares about what crimes cis white males commit against other cis white males.who cares.
this will never bring back Trayvon, the only murdered child who matters
That's not how the burden of evidence works. You don't need CCTV footage of a crime or a diary entry confessing to murder in order to convict someone. There's a mound of circumstantial against this guy. Yeah, the internet search about children dying in hot cars could be a coincidence but "forgetting" about the child 30 seconds after eating breakfast, the e-mail from the daycare center, the websites about living a child-free life? Come on.Good luck proving intent unless he told someone or wrote something about it.
They can make 20 theories as to why he should have noticed his son in the car, that will not change the fact that the very definition of being distracted is 'not noticing things that you should notice'.
They can make 20 theories about the way he reacted to the death, that will not change the fact people react to traumatic event in totally different ways (even him trying to muster up fake tears at the police station can be brushed away as him seeing he is in trouble and trying to behave in the way he is expected to behave).
They can find 20 reasons as to why he was not a good husband, that will not change the fact that it is irrelevant for the case at hand.
I mean, even if he spent his days saying to whoever wanted to listen: 'I would be happier if my son was dead', they still would not be able to prove intent. I don't think I would want a justice system where a Freudian slip constitutes intent.