Search results

Is no one going to demand more info about this? Who gives a fuck about Steve Harvey, when ex-girlfriends are doing Star Wars Furry porn?

Tanoomba

I feel like we've been down this road before, but rape is a legal term that has a precise definition. If she had spent her time learning something valuable like, say, the law, then we wouldn't be wasting our time having this conversation. Just because she wants me ripping on her 70s bush to be...

I want an electric guitar that shoots fire mounted to a car. That is all.

This doesn't necessarily mean that these law school "A" earners are the smartest people ever...just means that they knew slightly more than the person who earned the "A-." God Bless the standard distribution.

That shit happens all the time in DWI cases, because the only witness generally is the arresting officer. It's difficult for some people to hear, but the only thing needed to sustain a conviction is one witness through whom the state can introduce evidence. Since relevant evidence is anything...

I wonder how many air conditioners her fat ass is worth...

Tan, wouldnt a PM work equally as well? When you respond to someone publicly, you invite public comment.

How old is Islam?

I mean, cause Dickens or Twain are contemporary American Authors in the 21st Century, right?

Check this out. Dude was a semester away from being done with college.http://www.foxnews.com/us/2013/12/08...cmp=latestnews

Here's whats gonna happen...The cops are gonna try to brush this under the rug, but there will be public outcry. The National Organization of Women will get involved, and then a special prosecutor will take this guy to trial without an indictment. The public will have jumped to conclusions...

You say this, but the Supreme Court seems to think otherwise. See Lawrence v. Texas. Also See Scalia's dissent. Old Boy loses his shit.

In Texas Ebonics, it'd be, "Where you is, Wakandan?"

Here is a test of language vs. dialect. If you are white, go find a member of the black community, and speak ebonics to them. If they find it acceptable when you say "Wakandan" with the frequency and normalcy with which Jeantel described it on Piers Morgan the other night, then the argument for...

I'll not disagree with you there. The people out rioting after the verdict are proof of that.

You may think that its misguided, but the Supreme Court didn't think so, twice. Why we have arguments anymore about what is apparently a fundamental right is beyond me. And if you think I'm exaggerating about the fundamental right part, go read the holdings for D.C. v. Heller, and McDonald v...

Would this be the same home that he was forced to go live at because his mom couldn't handle him anymore?

This is actually entirely relevant to the case. Its whole reason that Zimmerman just walked. But you knew that. I can tell that you went to law school from the way that you don't argue from emotion

Yeah, they can change laws going forward, sure. But the Constitution forbids Ex Post Facto Laws, so a change would have no effect on this trial

If you guys want some severe jimmie rustlage check this out. Apparently the DOJ helped organize protests against Zimmerman http://pjmedia.com/tatler/2013/07/10...rtin-protests/

Likely because the prosecution and the judge in the Casey Anthony trial failed to give the jury an instruction that they could find her guilty of something less than murder. Bet they don't make that mistake in this one.

Nah, by charging murder, they already charged everything lower. It'd be nice though, if they had to actually pick a mental state and be locked in with it for the duration. Something to take to your legislators, I think...

BTW, this is just a generic laying out of the Model Penal Code Homicide statute. Texas has very different requirements for capital murder than this lays out, but the idea is the same.

OK, here's why they can charge that. Homicide is a two part offense that requires a mens rea (mental state) and actus reus (action). If someone kills someone else, its homicide, because of the killing, the actus reus. Punishment is dependent upon the mental state at the time of the offense...

This. Also, the United States is really 51 different jurisdictional entities (governments). So even if an appeals court in Florida upheld this cellphone nonsense, it wouldnt be binding on any other state in the country. Sure, other states could look to that appellate decision for guidance, but...

This right here. If the state can't disprove this, then everything else is irrelevant.

BTW, there is a mercy rule in the courts, but the defense has to ask for it. Its called the "Directed Verdict," and it more or less is the defense asking the court to stop the trial because the prosecution failed to meet its burden of proof. Asked for it in Mock Trial during school. Nothing...

Public Policy Disputes that. The laws and statutes of a state override all other considerations, including private policies. Thus, a private citizen legally authorized to carry a firearm may do so, unless the area in which he carried the arm is a no-gun area as defined by the law.

You all realize that even after this trial, Zimmerman still has the right to appeal if he loses and could possibly have the verdict set aside by the Florida Appellate Courts for lack of evidence, right?

Long Live Tie Fighter...Long Live SNES Zelda!