Search results

Well, you are certainly 'at their mercy', yes.... But that in no way means that a whole population should become material property just because they lost a fight.

Hmmm interesting rebuttal. So, if the USA were still a slave owning nation in 2016, and world wealth & power distribution was still the same, surely the US could conquer and enslave any nation it so chose. Let's say that nation was Switzerland. In your view, does that mean the Swiss were...

To be fair, that balloon may have popped right in her eyeball. That'd suck.

New image, now with the correct number of boxes!

Equality of opportunity has some pretty compelling arguments against it: The problem is, everybody wants to convince you they're the short guy, even if they ain't.

6'3 - 231lbs

I make that noise in bed.

Nah, I'm done with this one. I just not care enough to play any more. I was faking it for most of today.

You're misunderstanding what is being discussed. Read it over again if you care.

Dude, you're smarter than that, and unfortunately for you, so am I. Chan linked present day rape statistics when I was clearly discussing rape as it related to primal society. The quote you used there was from an entirely different line of discussion. Try again.

Also Sylas, whoever you are, suck my fucking cock you mental midget.

... I'm not talking about current day, dude. Are you reading my posts?

Immune? No. In primal society maybe a very large woman could physically coerce a very small or sickly male... or multiple women could coerce an individual male... not sure how that's relevant though, as it would be an extreme outlier situation

He sure is. That would be why this image is funny.

They wear more clothing because the men make them do so, do protect their property from other men.

Lith dude, I'm not gonna read all that, especially since you misrepresent my argument in the first paragraph. I did not say ALL sexual encounters were through coercion. Furthermore, your large dong argument and mine are not mutually exclusive. Evolutionary history is vast - perhaps large...

Absolutely not, but some things make it easier - like a lion picking out a sick gazelle. Physical orientation, nakedness, size, etc

Being sexually coerced through physical force dude. There was a time in our evolutionary history where that was a good portion of sexual encounters. I'm arguing that many of our ideas of attraction are rooted in this period.

Ya know, just because most of what feminists talk about is bullshit, doesn't mean it all is. I'm not even saying women being portrayed as vulnerable is a bad thing. Neither is men taking pleasure in their conditioning to perpetuate that vulnerability. That shit is biology. To deny it's...

What am I white knighting? Women frequently being portrayed as sexually vulnerable is readily observable. You're probably just unaware of what you're seeing. What, in your estimation, is the purpose of men wearing pants while women wear skirts? Or high heels? Or hair style differences? I'm...

Not at all really. I'm talking about primal behaviours that evolved long before society, or laws, or feminism, and that still dictate our sexual behaviours to this day. Men find easy sexual targets more appealing. It ain't rocket appliances.

Again, sexual invitation is not sexual aggression. I'd find it very difficult to perceive a woman who was on all fours presenting her buttocks as anything but submissive/vulnerable. Maybe we'll just have to agree to disagree. I'm not all that interested in this debate.

Lithose, there is a difference between aggression and invitation. There is nothing sexually aggressive about the naked woman. Keep in mind, I'm talking about 'vulnerability' from a cave-man utilitarian perspective. We have already established that women are vulnerable (because they are...

Don't be fucking dumb. You know damn well I wasn't talking about all women. I'm talking about overall societal pressure that is observable in day to day life. Consume some media that is meant to titilate women, like erotic fiction, analyze the behaviours and internal narrative of the...

Alright. Women aren't encouraged to present themselves as weak or vulnerable (physically, emotionally, intellectually) to attract and arouse potential sexual partners. What ever was I thinking?

Which woman looks like she could more effectively resist your sexual advances if that were her desire?

Then sorry dude, you have no concept of what sexual vulnerability even is. It's blatantly in your face in that second pic.

I don't understand how that's possible. Both these women are attractive. Which one do you wanna fuck more? Why?

Google 'sexiest women' and 'sexiest men'. Take note of: Setting? Clothing? Pose? Lighting? Facial expression? I just did it and most of the women are under soft light, laying down, puckered lips, fuck-me eyes, pushed out hips/ass... sexual vulnerability. The men are for the most...

Hoping for a new Burnout game reveal. Also wanna hear more about Sea of Thieves.

This isn't a conversation about if women can look 'hot' when they aren't presented sexually... of course they can.

Well there are absolutely biological brain differences. Claiming otherwise is just silly. What I meant by 'not disputable' is that 'grooming' is absolutely responsible for some percentage of the female 'vulnerability as sexuality' relationship. Biology is certainly responsible for a portion...

Uhhhh I hope you're joking. That's the same kind of shit argument people use against Trump.

Hmmm I'll have to go back and read, cuz I didn't catch that. What I'm saying is that we as a society certainly recognize inherent female vulnerability, and then relate that vulnerability to sexual desirability. Young girls are absolutely encouraged to give off sexual vulnerability signals...

Is anyone arguing otherwise? I think the discussion is centred on the fact that we recognize, emphasize, and perpetuate vulnerability as sex appeal in women.

No. But it is an inadequate explanation for gender based sexual expression norms on its own. This is observable in the way men vs. women are posed/presented in pornographic material, or in things like common clothing styles, or grooming practices.

She tried, and your response was 'men are more visual - biology!' If you aren't at least willing to concede that nakedness has a relationship with sexual vulnerability, then there's no reason for her to continue the conversation into areas of more complex thought.

Mist is right on the money on this. You dudes are being fucking retarded.

And videotape her.

People on my Facebook feed liking the shit out of this one. It's pretty clear they, much like the owners of this salon, have zero knowledge of basic economics. Gender-neutral prices for haircuts introduced at Halifax salon - Nova Scotia - CBC News