You have to follow the whole thread man. I started by writing that I didn't have sympathy for pirates. Many people disagreed, commenting on how fucked up the media providers are. While I agree the media providers can be shitty and shady, I felt many of the comments about media providers overstated the situation (no competition vs. little competition etc), and said as much. Then, I wrote that I didn't think the situation was bad enough to justify piracy, instead I think those claims are rationalizations. It is my view that most people illegally download because its easy and there are likely to be little to no consequences.
Its been pretty clearly spelled out for you.
The margins on distribution are absurdly bloated. The efforts to defend against piracy are to ensure continued robber baron level margins.
We have hard evidence that more reasonable content delivery will result in a decrease in real piracy. See Steam and pre-nerf Netflix. See also movies making enormous amount of money still despite DVD piracy.
This situation then is essentially price gouging that benefits mostly a middle man. We, the end users/consumers, have enough data to conclude that this is so. Why on earth would we feel a moral compunction to honor these middle man price gouging distributor's claim to "copywright" (generally on a piece of art, high or low, that they didn't create or truly even
OWN) when we know for a fact that they are artificially fixing a price astronomically higher than true value? You aren't moral or decent for buying physical blu-ray, you're pretty much stupid and uninformed. Which is just how the distribution network wants it.
How did we get to the point of Steam? Legit question, I'm not 100% on the history. But as I seem to recall it began as an effort to DRM software to protect it against piracy. In the process they have managed to build a better mousetrap. Now they have cornered the market and a legion of imitators have sprung up for a piece of the pie. This is after a time, as I remember, when there were serious concerns about the future viability of PC gaming due to widespread and unchecked piracy. As mentioned earlier, is this really a result of convenience and delivery only, or were games simply overpriced? Steam is more than just a clever interface, its a market correction.
In the realm of TV particularly though the situation is even more absurd because there is literally no physical good like there is with software, and can be with music or movies. People have recorded TV for decades, and even VHS was able to be copied and shared. Is that really THEFT to you? Are cable companies really worried about thieves, or protecting their ability to price gouge?