Captain Suave
Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
- 5,233
- 8,924
Weird shit in ai images doesn't bug me when it's posted here, or in similar environments. I think the imperfection is fine when the entire conversion is about AI image generation anyways.My FB feed has become filled with shit like this - although granted it all comes from pages FB is suggesting I follow, not ones I actually follow (yet). This is a military one, but you see shit from all sorts, lots of pics of "cutaways" of planes like the B1 Lancer, Female pilots (with too many fingers), houses that look off when you look too cloesly, you name it. What gets me though is when you click on the fucking comments. Half are "wow, that's awesome" while the other half either figure something is not quite right but can't put their finger on it, or think it's real but some new means to do something that is being showcased. And all these people vote... God we are heading for a fucked up future... I'd say I'm looking forward to moving into a cabin in the woods, but I've seen too many FB images of impossible cabins in the woods to think I'd be safe there lol!
View attachment 536266
I keep arguing this point with my GF, who is a graphic designer. I keep telling her that creative types are the only ones that we just accept get royalties in perpetuity for their work and that it's bullshit.Artistic styles are not copyrightable. An artist can't and shouldn't be able to own a style.
I keep arguing this point with my GF, who is a graphic designer. I keep telling her that creative types are the only ones that we just accept get royalties in perpetuity for their work and that it's bullshit.
Do structural engineers get $0.01 for every car that drives over a bridge they designed? Do the construction workers get royalties? Do doctors get $0.01 for every day a patient lives after a life saving surgery? Do they get royalties when they develop a new surgical technique that ends up being used in every hospital? Do septic companies get a bonus for every drain field that lasts beyond its expected lifespan? Do cops get anything at all, let alone anything approaching financial compensation in perpetuity for good work?
No, none of that. But actors keep getting checks 20 years after being on some sitcom and musicians get a check every time their song is played on Spotify or in a Ford commercial.
Her reasoning is always that the people I mention have retirements and 401ks and I always tell her that we pay into that for years and artists have those options too.
If you were born in say 2016-17 as a 7-8 would you know which one is AI generated
I didn’t even know streets of fire existed, they both have that same movie production aesthetic, even if one is built to emulate a specific era whereas the other is genuinely a product of its time. They are both effectively artificial, one is a movie set, the other is a digital composition —but does either look truly “faker” than the other…its the lighting, in both of them, that makes it look “fake”, but fake like filmed under special lighting, or totally a digital medium with no real world proxy fake
I for one am pretty excited at the idea that an individual person could make an entire movie within the next 10 years, all by themselves, and the production value look AAA. We have people that are dedicated, and have fantastic film knowledge in their heads of where to put the camera and how the lighting should look, etc, in just something like Astartes.The AI artifacts in the first one are pretty obvious. Subtly warping geometry, limited movement, etc. It's remarkably good, though, and I expect in the next few months/years we wont' be able to tell any more.
I for one am pretty excited at the idea that an individual person could make an entire movie within the next 10 years, all by themselves, and the production value look AAA. We have people that are dedicated, and have fantastic film knowledge in their heads of where to put the camera and how the lighting should look, etc, in just something like Astartes.
So imagine if you will, what an equally or greater, creative person will bring to the table with a full suite of AI tools at their disposal?
The question then becomes.. will the AI that can do this continue to be free for all to use? Or will there be a barrier to entry? Or will it be more of a Warcraft > MOBA type of thing where they've added specific clauses for any use of the AI that deems a profit, should share the profit in a 90/10 split (exaggeration, but not by much Im sure.)
I think it'll be hard for most people to make a cohesive story that's 2+ hours.I would say it's possible now without ai, considering what the current batch of 3d tools are capable of. Although admittedly, it would take a lot of time. I think the bigger issue with a single person doing it is their own attention/focus. I think people tend to get skilled at something to the exclusion of other things, so someone that is truly excellent at something has gotten there by pouring all of their effort and focus into that one thing (possibly with some very rare exceptions). Not only would the really excellent at x people be (relatively) crap at everything else, they likely wouldn't even want to do those things because they know they're relatively crap at them and they take time and effort away from their specialty. I guess ai will eventually just let people just get good at directing 100% ai assets though?
That should really be the easiest part. There are a lot more people capable of writing a screenplay/novel than people who can do any of the other parts of a feature-length movie solo.I think it'll be hard for most people to make a cohesive story that's 2+ hours.
Are any of the animation / movie things runnable at home on a 12ish gig gpu? I haven't looked into it.