Starting a 6 month bulk from tomorrow, finally doing it properly no excuses:
Macros at 161lbs
Training Days:
Calories: 2555
Protein: 190g
Carbohydrate: 280g
Fat: 75g
Rest Days:
Calories: 2455
Protein: 190g
Carbohydrate: 255g
Fat: 75g
I thought you were doing a cut?Starting a 6 month bulk from tomorrow, finally doing it properly no excuses:
Macros at 161lbs
Training Days:
Calories: 2555
Protein: 190g
Carbohydrate: 280g
Fat: 75g
Rest Days:
Calories: 2455
Protein: 190g
Carbohydrate: 255g
Fat: 75g
Don't be afraid to get fat. .
I thought you were doing a cut?
Why not go higher on your bulk, dont' you think those sick gainz would be higher if you ate over 3k calories?
Are you saying that your end-target caloric intake is higher than 2500, and you're just going to gradually increase it over time? Or that you're going to measure your progress / weight gain / lifts / gainz and increase calories as needed, and that 2500 represents a lower bound on what you think your body could need to gain with?And no, as I said before, you increase calories gradually
I'm at 20-25% body fat, so above his threshold limiting a muscle-building diet. How is his statement on body sensitivity to growth defensible when the strongest dudes in the world carry a lot of fat?If you’re reading this and in the 15-20% body fat range, you have no business starting a muscle-building diet.
You need to get lean first. That’s critical. Your body is much more sensitive to growth when you’re lean to begin with. It also gives you a much bigger ‘space’ to grow into.
If you start at 15% body fat, you’ll get fat quick and find yourself in need of dieting again.
I enjoyed this article too:
http://www.rntfitness.co.uk/the-myt...nt-build-maximum-muscle-if-you-stay-too-lean/
This part was pretty targeted at me though:
I'm at 20-25% body fat, so above his threshold limiting a muscle-building diet. How is his statement on body sensitivity to growth defensible when the strongest dudes in the world carry a lot of fat?
Sure I get that, but his argument was about growth sensitivity, which is something I haven't seen mentioned a lot of in my limited researched. I mean, should someone tell Eddie Hall and the Mountain that they'll only hit new heights by going on a 6-8 week cut to resensitize their body to growth? Or is Vaghela's statement about growth sensitivity decreasing at >15% body fat just a technique he uses to get clients who ask him to recompose their bodies to shut the fuck up about gaining and eat their vegetables and chicken breasts until they aren't chubby like me?because strength focused guys eg strongmen like Eddie Hall, The Mountain etc don't care about body composition, they just care about getting strong, that's why they eat 10k a day. Having a six pack makes no difference when you're trying to deadlift 465kg.
That article is from an online body composition coach, their clients either want to get leaner or add muscle. Of course strength is part of that process but their articles aren't geared towards aspiring Eddie Halls - they are geared to the guy that wants to get on stage in some speedos, not deadlift 465kg
should someone tell Eddie Hall and the Mountain
This fat fuck can bench 405 too. It's not impressive when you're that large, sorry Lyrical.
You'll be sub 200 if you plan on being sub 10%. That's a fact. Until you prove you're some genetic outlier, I'll believe what logic and science tell me.
Good luck though, I look forward to your results.
Why isn't it impressive? Would it suddenly become impressive if that guy followed what I'm assuming is years of weight lifting with some number of months of cutting and repeated the move?
Only valuing strength if it comes from someone beneath a certain body fat seems narrow-minded to me. To me it's the other side of the coin of the fat gym-bros who have no respect for a shredded lean person who doesn't have that much pure muscle mass.
We are fucking humans, lifting any weight isn't impressive. Great he can rep 405, yet will die of an aneurysm because he is extremely unhealthy.Why isn't it impressive? Would it suddenly become impressive if that guy followed what I'm assuming is years of weight lifting with some number of months of cutting and repeated the move?
Only valuing strength if it comes from someone beneath a certain body fat seems narrow-minded to me. To me it's the other side of the coin of the fat gym-bros who have no respect for a shredded lean person who doesn't have that much pure muscle mass.
after reading the bio of the characters of that youtube show, I think death from aneurysm is the least of his concerns, lol.We are fucking humans, lifting any weight isn't impressive. Great he can rep 405, yet will die of an aneurysm because he is extremely unhealthy.
"I challenge anyone to come on down here and fight me, I'll give you $1,000, and I'll give you one free shot. Remember, no liability. Take a look at these teeth people, I'm a middle aged man! Come on down, we can have a teeth comparing contest, a physique contest, whatever! You wanna fight? Whatever. We'll do it all." --Fat Fuckin Lenny
"And people say, 'What if you die Lenny, what if you die?' Well if I die, I want you to oil me up, put me in the posing trunks, and roll my corpse onto that stage next to Dale, and I'll still be bigger and harder than him." --Big Lenny
No one gives a shit that a 300 pound fatty can lift 400 pounds. It would be more impressive if he could drop 100 pounds and repeat the same lift, but that's not possible unless he's on some fancy pharmaceuticals.
No, it's an unimpressive fatty pretending to be the whole coin.
The point is if you're that fucking fat, you're benching what... 1.5x your body weight if that?Why isn't it impressive? Would it suddenly become impressive if that guy followed what I'm assuming is years of weight lifting with some number of months of cutting and repeated the move?
Only valuing strength if it comes from someone beneath a certain body fat seems narrow-minded to me. To me it's the other side of the coin of the fat gym-bros who have no respect for a shredded lean person who doesn't have that much pure muscle mass.
My trainer makes me send him weekly progress pics.
The first pic is of me at 273, this second on the right is at 251. I'm 246 now. Like I said, we'll get down to 227 and I'll go get a hydro measure. We'll see. He's adding in cardio very soon, right now it's just weights and MMA.
Also, I haven't really lost that much size, my trainer has dropped my calories by 20%. I fill out the next day after a cheat meal.
View attachment 154914
If you're benching 400 plus with proper form you're not fat, you're big. I don't care what anyone says.
#impressivenumberatanysize