Gravel
Mr. Poopybutthole
Only somewhat related, but several years ago I saw an article or YouTube video that was talking about the idea of "dirty bulking" being bad and how it may not necessarily be trueHeh, I'm not a new lifter but in my five years of lifting this is my first serious and sustained attempt at eating at a surplus
As referred to above, I've gone through several cycles of falling off the wagon and dieting back down. My only real previous attempts at getting bigger were ended early because I was scared of getting fat
So I feel like I still had some untapped growth potential
I actually went with my online coach because he'd written an article about how trying to gain muscle with minimal fat was a slower way of doing it. I wanted to break out of my permacut mindset and told him I don't care about fat I just want max gains, hence putting the calories up
But like I said you're way out with your 15lbs estimation. 75% fat 25% muscle gain is more into "dirty" or uncontrolled bulk territory. We've increased my calories slowly and I track everything every single day
If from the 19lbs 4 is water then that leaves 15lbs of fat and muscle. Maybe 50/50 split is the best estimate - that would roughly mirror what my Wi-Fi bio impedance scales say, and yeah yeah I know they're not accurate but they weren't that far it from the dxa
Basically, every fitness guru will tell you it doesn't work! But the issue is almost every single one of them has done one. What it boils down to is the question of whether everyone needs to do a crappy bulk where you put on a ton of fat at least once in order to build that base of strength. After your first one, you can go with a more "lean bulk" where you don't put on excess fat. While doing several dirty bulks and then cuts is likely spinning your wheels, the first one may be necessary.
Anyway, you may be right. I thought about your water weight, but didn't say anything. But if you've legitimately got several pounds of water weight on (could be more than 4 if you started up creatine), that would definitely explain some of your weight. But still, a pound of muscle a month is on the very high end of what is possible in someone that isn't completely untrained.
I always go back to the whole, go to the grocery store and pick up a pound of ground beef. Now pick up 10 (or 5 or 20, or whatever the person is discussing, although usually it's on the higher end). Do you really think it's reasonable to put that much lean muscle on that fast? People get depressed about putting on 12 pounds in a year when that is fucking massive.