It was inevitable that large stakeholders would start to ensure that bitcoin mining wouldn't be a source of concern for them after they bought multi-billions worth of the coin. They just saw bitcoin drop 50% from a recent ATH and most of that was in a week, over carbon pollution FUD. This IS them attempting to 'own the framing' and trying to change the current narrative, which is largely bunk pushed by haters who don't understand the technology. Is this the best way to do it? I dunno. But I don't see it as a power grab. Sometimes you have to regulate yourselves or the feds will do it for you and they'll be worse at it.short write up RE: the "Bitcoin mining council" sums up how I feel pretty well. I'll be quite happy to be proven wrong on this, but I don't like it right now.
This is the opposite of owning the framing
As bitcoiners we should be hyper-vigilant about these type of attacks that start off as what seems to be a benign virtue signal.tftc.io
They have no legal authority to do jack shit. Mining is worldwide. The USG can't mandate that non-US miners join this or self report or anything. Worst case is American buyers are forced to buy renewable mined coins I guess?
Bitcoin was designed to resist the world's most powerful governments. If bitcoin is vulnerable to Saylor and Musk seizing control, then crypto is worthless anyway.
- 1
- 1