I have been told that this is ok because ransomware has happened before crypto. To the moon we go.wormie some boomer stuff for you (they are a starring figure on your chart)
anything so the already rich old fucks can keep their money and take others
View attachment 361293
at least it's clear you have sided with the real criminals:
markets.businessinsider.com
That seems like a weird leap of logic; a leap right off a cliff of retarded. What does Barclays have to do with governments considering increases in a particular type of a crime arising from availability of crypto?at least it's clear you have sided with the real criminals:
Barclays bans UK customers from making card payments to Binance, citing a notice from the national regulator
Customers immediately took to Twitter to express frustration over the sudden ban, with some threatening to close their accounts.
one of many examples
Barclays Agrees to Pay $2 Billion in Civil Penalties to Resolve Claims for Fraud in the Sale of Residential Mortgage-Backed Securities
The United States has reached agreement with Barclays Capital, Inc. and several of its affiliates (together, Barclays) to settle a civil action filed in December 2016 in which the United States sought civil penalties for alleged conduct related to Barclays’ underwriting and issuance of...www.justice.gov
based on your posts, you are anti-decentralization. you say crypto is only good for ransomware. I would imagine you can see how those items are related to large banking institutions? you are harping on pennies with emerging tech yet seemingly content with the existing system supporting and profiting from actual crimes regularly with much larger sums involved. should i just post a few white collar crime news reports everytime you post some dumb thing about ransomware?
The only thing a semi intelligent person would get out of my posts in this thread is that I believe crypto is facilitating the massive increase in ransomware and that Tether is a dumpster fire ponzi scheme that is going to implode. Anything else is a projection of a weaker intellect.
anything so the already rich old fucks can keep their money and take others
View attachment 361293
Seems like it's facilitating a demand for cyber security jobs and exposing a surprisingly significant lax of cyber security in corporate U.S.A. This is just another thing a market needs to respond to (and will).
I dont disagree with any of this. Problem is there is no way security market will respond in time so governments will, eventually, step in.
www.sportico.com
