Flobee
Vyemm Raider
- 2,674
- 3,072
Bitcoin as digital land is a very different (similarly flawed) comparison. Bitcoin (the asset) is a scarce resource with value that exists on Bitcoin (the network). If you own 1 BTC nobody else can own that BTC. There can only ever be 21 million so you own that piece of finite resource in the way that owning acreage works. I don't like the analogy very much, but its not entirely inaccurate.
Owning an NFT is owning a unique on-chain entity but I fail to see how it is scarce in the way that UTXO's on Bitcoin are scarce. Admittedly I may not fully grasp how it will all work in the future but there does not seem to be a limiting factor on minting new NFTs. There is no cap so while each one may be unique, I fail to see scarcity that would be required for a comparison to land.
I mean yea, there are dozens of pages of me arguing with James that are very similar in tone.Little man there is just having an emotional response like a woman