- 14,472
- 27,162
You don't scale L1 to do what ETH is doing and stay decentralized. Thats the whole point. They screwed up by shoving all of that data in L1 instead of waiting for L2 to develop to a place where they could do the calculations off chain. Even Vitalik is admitting that now. ETH is a bungled project and they're scrambling to try to bail it out. Maybe PoS will breath some life into it and prolong the abomination.
Vitalik created ETH because he was impation with BTC dev pacing. He wanted to move fast and break this, BTC devs wanted to keep the codebase rock solid and move slowly. In the long run I'd rather be using the platform that took its time testing before moving code into production. Fortunately we all get to invest into what we're comfortable with. IMO Ethereum will not fare well in the long run, and if it does, it will do so as a effectively centralized entity.
Do you know about the difficulty they built into ETH?
Just for fun, here is a 4 year old thread, updated every time ETH 2.0 gets delayed.
And the latest update in this thread:
Right, that's what I said.
You read a Twitter thread, and it scared you.
You might be right, but I haven't seen any of the hallmarks that indicate you actually know. But rather your are conveying the opinion of another.
Which is what I am doing as well to a large degree.
But linking random Twitter threads, or a BTC evangelist isn't really convincing in any way other than emotionally
- 1