Butthurt white guys, an Asian virgin and an angry lesbian walk into a bar...

I'm fairly certain a prosecutor could get rape charges to stick against a women video taped sexually assaulting a drunk male. Just none have had the desire to bring such a case non anal raping of drunk men is simply not considered a crime.

Siddar_sl said:

I'm fairly certain a prosecutor could get rape charges to stick against a women video taped sexually assaulting a drunk male. Just none have had the desire to bring such a case non anal raping of drunk men is simply not considered a crime.

Click to expand...

So, in theory, aren't men more prone to be raped because of their biological imperative to mate affects their judgement more than a woman when both are similarly intoxicated? You know, since they're so rapey, the woman is taking advantage of the man by putting him in a situation where he is less capable of making a rational decision than the woman?

Someone could set up a internet site that does nothing but show women sexually assaulting drunk mean at college parties and listing college where it happened with each picture video tape.

Would make the PC college crowd and administrators heads explode.

But you have would to be a real dick to do something like that.

Siddar_sl said:

I'm fairly certain a prosecutor could get rape charges to stick against a women video taped sexually assaulting a drunk male. Just none have had the desire to bring such a case non anal raping of drunk men is simply not considered a crime.

Click to expand...

I'm not even sure if it can actually be rape, even under your circumstances. I believe it changed a few years ago, but up until recently, "rape" was literally defined as penetration of the penis, into a orifice of the victim. So even if some lady held you down, and used a strap on to fuck you, it wasn't rape. However, some time ago, as far as I know, it was changed so that any object which "penetrates" now constitutes as rape.

But that still means, it can't legally be "rape" if a woman drugs you, gets you hard and "rapes" you. As long as she doesn't penetrate you, it's not rape. Even if she keeps you in a cage and makes you perform at gun point--not rape. This is how it was explained to me, but I haven't done my own research, so if I'm wrong, someone please let me know. But, supposedly, this is one of the reasons why rape statistics for young boys is below sexual assault statistics, because female molestation can't be rape.

The feminist author who first perpetuated the 1 in 4 women statistic is one of the people that advocates against classifying molested children as rape victims. Here is a quote from her.

"Although consideration of male victims is within the scope of the legal statutes,it is important to restrict the term rape to instances where male victims were penetrated by offenders.It isinappropriate to consider as a rape victim a man who engages in unwanted sexual intercourse with a woman.p. 206"

How is that for some hypocrisy?

uhh this thread is ridiculously long


who's thread MVP and what about the pizza discussion

by thread MVP i mean who's winning these arguments

by winnig these arguments i mean who looks like the biggest asshole

is it Tanoomba or?

eXarc_sl said:

by thread MVP i mean who's winning these arguments

by winnig these arguments i mean who looks like the biggest asshole

is it Tanoomba or?

Click to expand...

Tanoomba probably has the biggest asshole since he seems like he's the bottom in his claimed relationship.

If guy gets drunk and knocks up a woman, why is he responsible for the child? She got him drunk and manipulated him into blowing a load in her for her own pregnancy selfish purposes.

Trollface_sl said:

TOP 10 MVP.

Click to expand...

that's what i'm talkin about, stats stats stats

gonna start a Rerolled ESPN where me and my bro anchors discuss poster statistics and posting playbooks etc etc

Trollface you have an honorary spot my man