- 25,426
- 49,042
They learn EVERYTHING. According to her and Tanoomba.Is she really claiming that people "learn" to be gay?
They learn EVERYTHING. According to her and Tanoomba.Is she really claiming that people "learn" to be gay?
I know, I know. UnrustlingJive.. unrustle your jimmies. Tanotard will be tanotard, is not the first and not the last.
If I had to make some guesses I'd say a few abnormally wired circuits in the brain cause them to model/emulate the "incorrect" observed gender roles and sex behaviors.Is she really claiming that people "learn" to be gay?
If I had to make some guesses I'd say a few abnormally wired circuits in the brain cause them to model/emulate the "incorrect" observed gender roles and sex behaviors.
You don't say. Might be something you'd like to familiarize yourself with before entering these kinds of discussionsand the science of sex is not something I've really studied at all so I can't tell you.
When I said few people would choose to be gay I was referring to the constant, incorrectly constructed "choice" vs "born that way" binary. There are actually plenty of other options besides those two. You could not be born that way but life experiences could alter your sexuality. Or you could be born in a way that makes you model abnormal sexual behaviors over the course of your development but you weren't actually BORN liking hot dude on dude action.Mist, so youre saying its possible to reprogram your own lesbianism?
And that your own carpet munching was a choice?
Just because it could be one cause doesn't mean it's the only possible cause. A variety of different things could make any given person gay.It would be crazy to think that abnormal androgen exposure at particular points in the brain's development in utero would be the cause.... totally crazy.....
Honestly, how can you feel comfortable cramming your hypothesis in here? It's so obviously wrong
Again, adult brains. Also correlational. Maybe being gay caused their brain to develop that way, rather than their brain being that way caused them to be gay? Or maybe a third factor caused both. You don't seem to understand what "correlation does not imply causality" means.I'm sure you'll claim victory with their prison example, but hopefully you'll recognize how empty a victory it truly is
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/n...gay-brain.html
You didn't read the article. They discussed that.Again, adult brains. Also correlational. Maybe being gay caused their brain to develop that way, rather than their brain being that way caused them to be gay? Or maybe a third factor caused both. You don't seem to understand what "correlation does not imply causality" means.
It's not evidence against. It does nothing to refute the hypothesis. And what part exactly is evidence-free? That behavior modelling and incentive/reward/reinforcement schedules are powerful enough to reshape human behavior? There's 70 fucking years of easily reproducible behavioral psychology that can do that.You didn't read the article. They discussed that.
That's the second time you've thrown that phrase around as if it magically makes evidence against your evidence-free hypothesis disappear