Lanx
<Prior Amod>
he lives in london, have you seen their demographics?You sound submissive rn ngl
- 1
he lives in london, have you seen their demographics?You sound submissive rn ngl
I don't live in London lol, it's a hell hole.he lives in london, have you seen their demographics?
See the title.
There is a concept in evolution called filtering. It's very likely that a "great filter" caused the rapid adaptation to lactose in norther European populations. Without this great filter to temper a population, can other populations call themselves "white"?
I feel like there is a subtlety to this statement that is easy to gloss over given recent shifts lmaohe lives in london, have you seen their demographics?
You clearly aren't familiar with my goals good sir.I don't drink cow secretions and achieve the same goal.
No, really, it was just founder effect. This has been studied extensively. You're repeating the just-so story people told back in like the 60s about this topic, actual studies have shown theres no evidence selection acted on this "benefit".Having an additional nutrient source is evolutionarily advantageous. Being white is all about living in an inhospitable place and having alternate nutrient sources eg pale skin helping synthesise Vitamin D.
You keep saying that, and yet offer no proof. It's obviously an advantage in a number of ways, yet we're supposed to go against common sense and believe you because you appealed to authority in the absolute weakest way possible. "Trust me guys they did studies in the 60s".No, really, it was just founder effect. This has been studied extensively. You're repeating the just-so story people told back in like the 60s about this topic, actual studies have shown theres no evidence selection acted on this "benefit".
Ah yes being able to reap the milk of an extremely robust animal nearly indefinitely while only feeding it grass is of no benefit at all. ESPECIALLY if you can't form a civilization much less any agriculture or farming.No, really, it was just founder effect. This has been studied extensively. You're repeating the just-so story people told back in like the 60s about this topic, actual studies have shown theres no evidence selection acted on this "benefit".
These are not mutually exclusive.No, really, it was just founder effect. This has been studied extensively. You're repeating the just-so story people told back in like the 60s about this topic, actual studies have shown theres no evidence selection acted on this "benefit".
for me if i have no milk my shit is solidI'm not sure if I have lack toes and taller ants. I might. Is there a bench mark for much milk you can drink before getting explosive diarrhea? For me, it's 16 ounces and I have about 5 minutes to find a toilet. But 30-45 minutes later I'm good. I keep drinking milk, so I'm not sure where I stand. 8 ounces will still give me a runny shit, but it's not explosive.
Did you know Madonna did a "Got Milk?" commercial? I'm pretty sure it was the most popular and influential "Got Milk?" commercial ever made.This thread is still better than the Joker: Mick Foley’s Deuce thread.
That thread is fucking GAAAAY.
Did you know Madonna did a "Got Milk?" commercial? I'm pretty sure it was the most popular and influential "Got Milk?" commercial ever made.
Fuck Madonna. Mendes is where it's at.
It's a tiny danish brand, est 1972 of some such. Spent all their money on Mendes sucking on the chocolate bon in 20xx. Pulled out of the US few years back. It's a classic over here, hand-in-hand with hotdog vendors.Wow what a successful campaign. I've never heard of cocio before. 14 years later it finally worked on me. Also, the mix of english and what I assume was spanish was weird.