Kaley Cuoco for Captain Marvel.
View attachment 322649
I dont think she has aged all that well, I mean dont get me wrong she is still hot but the decline is happening fastKaley Cuoco for Captain Marvel.
View attachment 322649
She is great as Harley Quinn on the animated show as wellYou know, it could work. She has a new show about being a slutty flight attendant on HBO Max. She’s decent in it and she’s physically matured.
I think she's actually a sociopath or has been IRL snatched and made into a pod person like in Invasion of the Body Snatchers. She has the most completely dud personality of any actress I have ever seen.I mean Brie is a sjw cunt but shes certainly attractive...
Does "physically matured" mean had a ton of plastic surgery?You know, it could work. She has a new show about being a slutty flight attendant on HBO Max. She’s decent in it and she’s physically matured.
Nose job and forehead filler in 2017, some neck tucking in 2018. Boobs sometime in there. She got skinnier, so her face tightened up, which is where her ass went, and likely why she got implants. Looks like she's had a lifetime of shitty skin, and that probably fucked up her self-image. Also, zero fucking style or makeup sense.Does "physically matured" mean had a ton of plastic surgery?
Hold on now;Nose job and forehead filler in 2017, some neck tucking in 2018. Boobs sometime in there. She got skinnier, so her face tightened up, which is where her ass went, and likely why she got implants. Looks like she's had a lifetime of shitty skin, and that probably fucked up her self-image. Also, zero fucking style or makeup sense.
Brie Larson, Before and After
The beauty evolution of the ‘Captain Marvel’ star.theskincareedit.com
Reminds me a lot of one of my exes. Body issues out the whiz wang, because she wanted to be famous, but was a general fuck up... though still kept giving a half-assed effort, while sort of figuring it out too late. 40 isn't when you enter showbusiness.
So she was hot to begin with and progressively got less hot, even though she would have still been hot had she not done anything. Hollywood actors are dumb, news at 6.Hold on now;
Emily Blunt, Before and After
The beauty evolution of the 'Devil Wears Prada' star.theskincareedit.com
That wasnt the point but who cares about acting in a popcorn flick. Outside of Nebula the characters in the MCU are written with as much depth or range as a blank sheet of paper.But we'll just go ahead and ignore the part where Blunt is scientifically 3,000% better at acting.
Which is why Brie, the black hole of talent, is so annoying on screen.That wasnt the point but who cares about acting in a popcorn flick. Outside of Nebula the characters in the MCU are written with as much depth or range as a blank sheet of paper.
How does your science work ? Because the objective criteria is awards wins and nominations. Going by imdb, Larson has 64 wins and 63 nominations (with the most prestigious being an Academy Award in a leading role), Blunt has 22 wins and 96 nominations (with the most prestigious being a Golden Globe for a supporting role in a TV movie). I guess an argument can be made that Blunt's awards and nominations are spread over 10ish works in her 48 credits, while Larson's are mostly focused on 3 works out of 65 credits (but 18 of those credits are music videos as a teenager and tv shows as a child).But we'll just go ahead and ignore the part where Blunt is scientifically 3,000% better at acting.
That wasnt the point but who cares about acting in a popcorn flick. Outside of Nebula the characters in the MCU are written with as much depth or range as a blank sheet of paper.
except Brie's oscar win is almost as big a joke as Jennifer Lawrence's.How does your science work ? Because the objective criteria is awards wins and nominations. Going by imdb, Larson has 64 wins and 63 nominations (with the most prestigious being an Academy Award in a leading role), Blunt has 22 wins and 96 nominations (with the most prestigious being a Golden Globe for a supporting role in a TV movie). I guess an argument can be made that Blunt's awards and nominations are spread over 10ish works in her 48 credits, while Larson's are mostly focused on 3 works out of 65 credits (but 18 of those credits are music videos as a teenager and tv shows as a child).
On what objective criteria would you base that ? PS: Jennifer Lawrence has 119 awards and 183 nominations out of 34 credits.except Brie's oscar win is almost as big a joke as Jennifer Lawrence's.