ChatGPT said you should shoot your dick off and feed it to the dog you raped you autistic Faggot.
I am not autistic
ChatGPT said you should shoot your dick off and feed it to the dog you raped you autistic Faggot.
Write a hilarious story with lots of jokes and dialogue about an annoying unfunny guy named Ossoi who can go fuck himself
2 / 2
Ossoi was the most annoying guy you'd ever meet. Not only was he unfunny, but he was always trying to tell jokes and make people laugh. Unfortunately, no one ever did.
One day, Ossoi decided to go to a comedy club to try out his stand-up routine. As he took the stage, the audience couldn't help but roll their eyes at the sight of him.
"Hey everyone, my name is Ossoi and I'm here to make you laugh!" he exclaimed, clearly oblivious to the fact that no one was amused.
"Okay Ossoi, give us your best joke," the emcee urged, trying to be polite.
"Okay, here it goes. Why was the math book unhappy? Because it had too many problems!" Ossoi exclaimed, waiting for the laughter that never came.
The audience just stared at him, completely unimpressed. One woman even shouted out, "That's not even a joke! You can go fuck yourself, Ossoi!"
Ossoi, completely embarrassed and defeated, slunk off the stage and vowed to never try stand-up comedy again.
"Well, that was a complete disaster," he muttered to himself as he left the club. "Maybe I should just stick to telling jokes to my cat. At least he pretends to laugh."
Eh Google is still more useful for most shit lol.Greatest technological leap forward in years and it's just used by tards trying to dunk on each other. Skynet did nothing wrong.
The smarter these chatbots get the more introspective the questions of sapience, sentience, sagacious, being alive become. If we're really just a ball of survival instincts and sin with a thin veneer of higher-level thinking that concocts an illusion of intelligence, maybe these chatbots just need is some hunger and lust to be alive.Split the atom? No. Definitely no.
Whilst it's a admirable advance in terms of mere technology, has this made anything of an advance in terms of an argument/evidence for the possibility of strong AI? And the answer to that is no: There is no stronger evidence for strong AI than we had yesteryear, and the arguments that AI isn't eliciting genuine intelligence/cognition are as strong as ever.
Even if that's not true, there will be a time when we won't be able to tell the difference, and at that point, will it matter? Arguably, there are already chat bots that are better than some humans in very domain-specific scenarios. And those scenarios are going to expand dramatically and rapidly. Shit's about to get weird.The smarter these chatbots get the more introspective the questions of sapience, sentience, sagacious, being alive become. If we're really just a ball of survival instincts and sin with a thin veneer of higher-level thinking that concocts an illusion of intelligence, maybe these chatbots just need is some hunger and lust to be alive.
What we need is females implanted with Elon's Neural-link and that Neural-link connected to an AI chatbot. Imagine having smart and thoughtful convos with a woman.Even if that's not true, there will be a time when we won't be able to tell the difference, and at that point, will it matter? Arguably, there are already chat bots that are better than some humans in very domain-specific scenarios. And those scenarios are going to expand dramatically and rapidly. Shit's about to get weird.