moonarchia
The Scientific Shitlord
- 24,781
- 46,740
Or this chick is mentally unwell - which is much more likely.
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9ed26/9ed26efe21cfc42d424a9d44afe0fd56ee8f059f" alt="Glasses Why Dont We Have Both GIF by nounish ⌐◨-◨ Glasses Why Dont We Have Both GIF by nounish ⌐◨-◨"
- 1
Or this chick is mentally unwell - which is much more likely.
Pussy pass revoked.4 years on soliciting via SMS. Jury recommended 6 years. No assault or statutory rape occurred.
View attachment 569019
![]()
Former Wellston teacher sentenced to four years in prison
Emma Delaney Hancock will spend four years behind bars. The sentencing was read in court Wednesday afternoon after the jury initially recommended six years.www.yahoo.com
That's weird.4 years on soliciting via SMS. Jury recommended 6 years. No assault or statutory rape occurred.
View attachment 569019
![]()
Former Wellston teacher sentenced to four years in prison
Emma Delaney Hancock will spend four years behind bars. The sentencing was read in court Wednesday afternoon after the jury initially recommended six years.www.yahoo.com
Since most of these teachers are under 30, how the fuck are they not smart enough to know not to send anything electronically?That's weird.
"Court documents say she and a student began exchanging nude photos and videos.
The boy also told investigators he had met Hancock privately inside the school several times to ‘make out.’
Hancock denies she did anything wrong and says the student is lying."
Her defense was that he's lying? Were there nude photos and videos or not? Did she really get convicted because a student said he got them but deleted?
Maybe just a shitty writer.
Since most of these teachers are under 30, how the fuck are they not smart enough to know not to send anything electronically?
You got it backwards. It's the young uns who have more trust. They grew up with it. The risk is normalized. She probably sent nudes to her HS boyfriends and as far as she knew, they were never seen by anyone else.Since most of these teachers are under 30, how the fuck are they not smart enough to know not to send anything electronically?
I thought it read she had sent texts and shit. Maybe I misread it.You got it backwards. It's the young uns who have more trust. They grew up with it. The risk is normalized. She probably sent nudes to her HS boyfriends and as far as she knew, they were never seen by anyone else.
But I'm still not sure this one sent anything. It's hard to believe she'd still be calling him a liar if they produced pics or vids in court. If pictures were shown, surely she would have been saying they were deep fakes.
It said court documents say ..., but she calls him a liar so either she's living in denial or they weren't actually produced.I thought it read she had sent texts and shit. Maybe I misread it.
It said court documents say ..., but she calls him a liar so either she's living in denial or they weren't actually produced.
Or the most likely scenario is really shitty writing. Fuck it, I guess I'm going to look for more articles now.
![]()
Former Wellston substitute teacher convicted for sexting student
A Lincoln County jury found former Wellston substitute teacher Emma Delaney Hancock guilty Oct. 30, 2024, for interactions with students.nondoc.com
This seems more informative.
It doesn't seem like the video is there as hard evidence and the messages were over Snapchat, which by default gets deleted after reading.
"Although the 20 witnesses for the state discussed the alleged relationship in detail, jurors were never shown specific messages between Hancock and the student, something the defense attempted to emphasize while cross examining witnesses and during closing arguments."
She's also the wife of a cop, which seems to happen more often than you'd think by random coincidence.
It seems like she could have a case on appeal as the only direct testimony is from the kid and the other stuff is just rumors that were heard about.
"Throughout the trial, Hancock’s defense team attempted to cast doubt on prosecutors’ case by pointing out the numerous times the student told his friends of his relationship with Hancock. Although multiple students told jurors Tuesday that the student had flaunted his relationship with the substitute and showed them pictures and messages she had sent him, the student testified Monday he did not tell anyone about his relationship with Hancock until his father confronted him about it after a meeting with the Wellston High School principal."
It's not clear if any student witnesses claimed to have actually seen the pictures or videos, or if they were just told about it by the kid.
Seems like she had a terrible lawyer![]()
Former Wellston substitute teacher convicted for sexting student
A Lincoln County jury found former Wellston substitute teacher Emma Delaney Hancock guilty Oct. 30, 2024, for interactions with students.nondoc.com
This seems more informative.
It doesn't seem like the video is there as hard evidence and the messages were over Snapchat, which by default gets deleted after reading.
"Although the 20 witnesses for the state discussed the alleged relationship in detail, jurors were never shown specific messages between Hancock and the student, something the defense attempted to emphasize while cross examining witnesses and during closing arguments."
She's also the wife of a cop, which seems to happen more often than you'd think by random coincidence.
It seems like she could have a case on appeal as the only direct testimony is from the kid and the other stuff is just rumors that were heard about.
"Throughout the trial, Hancock’s defense team attempted to cast doubt on prosecutors’ case by pointing out the numerous times the student told his friends of his relationship with Hancock. Although multiple students told jurors Tuesday that the student had flaunted his relationship with the substitute and showed them pictures and messages she had sent him, the student testified Monday he did not tell anyone about his relationship with Hancock until his father confronted him about it after a meeting with the Wellston High School principal."
It's not clear if any student witnesses claimed to have actually seen the pictures or videos, or if they were just told about it by the kid.
Well ya see, the investigators could tell there was definitely some texts from an account name delaney. But snapchat wouldn't preserve the evidence so what're they supposed to do? I bet they never even proved delaney was her account.How the fuck did a jury convict someone based on a 15 year old boy claims he had nudes but didn't save them? Her lawyer must be fucking awful.
![]()
Former Wellston substitute teacher convicted for sexting student
A Lincoln County jury found former Wellston substitute teacher Emma Delaney Hancock guilty Oct. 30, 2024, for interactions with students.nondoc.com
This seems more informative.
It doesn't seem like the video is there as hard evidence and the messages were over Snapchat, which by default gets deleted after reading.
"Although the 20 witnesses for the state discussed the alleged relationship in detail, jurors were never shown specific messages between Hancock and the student, something the defense attempted to emphasize while cross examining witnesses and during closing arguments."
She's also the wife of a cop, which seems to happen more often than you'd think by random coincidence.
It seems like she could have a case on appeal as the only direct testimony is from the kid and the other stuff is just rumors that were heard about.
"Throughout the trial, Hancock’s defense team attempted to cast doubt on prosecutors’ case by pointing out the numerous times the student told his friends of his relationship with Hancock. Although multiple students told jurors Tuesday that the student had flaunted his relationship with the substitute and showed them pictures and messages she had sent him, the student testified Monday he did not tell anyone about his relationship with Hancock until his father confronted him about it after a meeting with the Wellston High School principal."
It's not clear if any student witnesses claimed to have actually seen the pictures or videos, or if they were just told about it by the kid.
I think she's denying that they met up inside the school to make out. One would assume the texts and photos are documented, but stupider cases have happened and people get convicted with no actual evidence all the time.That's weird.
"Court documents say she and a student began exchanging nude photos and videos.
The boy also told investigators he had met Hancock privately inside the school several times to ‘make out.’
Hancock denies she did anything wrong and says the student is lying."
Her defense was that he's lying? Were there nude photos and videos or not? Did she really get convicted because a student said he got them but deleted?
Maybe just a shitty writer.
I think she's denying that they met up inside the school to make out. One would assume the texts and photos are documented, but stupider cases have happened and people get convicted with no actual evidence all the time.
What makes this one weird is it's a woman being convicted with no actual evidence.
If there's no proof except testimony, thats absolutely ridiculous.One would assume. One of those articles says specifically they were not available to the jury. Because they were snapchat. So all they had was the testimony of the kid and some other kids who claim he showed them around. Before snapchat deleted them forever where even the cops couldn't get to them.
She's not a model by any means, but she's not THAT hideous.