Movies shouldn't exceed a single masturbatory interval.It should be normalized that an epic film should take at least 3-3.5 hours. Anyone who can’t focus on a single thing for that long is a softbrained simpleton.
- 1
Movies shouldn't exceed a single masturbatory interval.It should be normalized that an epic film should take at least 3-3.5 hours. Anyone who can’t focus on a single thing for that long is a softbrained simpleton.
Movies shouldn't exceed a single masturbatory interval.
Wrong. Look fag this was Transformers for Dune fags. All visual no emotion, I know retarded American Inventors love big boom boom on screeny thing make eyeballs go wow, but normal people need an actual reason to develop a connection to characters during a story.
This movie was getting to have sex with a super hot chick but she lays there like a dead fish.
No, the problem with part 2 is going to be a smartass zoomer cunt ruining 2/3rds of the movie because she can't fucking act and has no depth beyond 'smartass zoomer cunt' but she's sucking the directors dick so he's gonna build up her otherwise non-existent part.When part 2 comes out we are going to have a 6ish hour Dune epic and still you are going to be bleating about "STYLE OVER SUBSTANCE" and "BIG BOOM BOOM ON SCREENY THING".
Unless you're Paul the fucking Kwisatz Haderach Cooper Atreides-and a giant waste of money.
She's fucking Tom Holland but everyone thinks its gives them Extra Virtue Signal Points plus plus whatever. I think she isn't a bad actress but there has to be someone better for this then Zendaya. Who knows? If it gets the movie made, who gives a damn in the end. All she does in this is stand around in a transluncent gown and hold various things, says three lines at the end. Everyone hated Sean Young and she was fine in Lynch's Dune.No, the problem with part 2 is going to be a smartass zoomer cunt ruining 2/3rds of the movie because she can't fucking act and has no depth beyond 'smartass zoomer cunt' but she's sucking the directors dick so he's gonna build up her otherwise non-existent part.
All she does in this is stand around in a transluncent gown and hold various things, says three lines at the end.
But it sounds like Villeneuve will make up for that in the sequel movie. “I can’t wait to shoot the second part of Dune to get [Timothée Chalamet and Zendaya] back together,” he told Italian magazine Il Venerdì di Repubblica. “Knowing that in the next chapter Zendaya will be the protagonist of the story.”
We'll see how it works out. We know what the story is. DV isn't Marvel and this IP isn't the MCU; if he actually makes Chani the protagonist, which isn't apparent from everything we have seen so far, then the movie will fail and then it will be time to get GOT final season mad. Was that written in English? It sounds like a translation error more than anything else. He seems like he knows its Paul's story. Let's see what makes it to the screen for Part 2. Right now BoozeCube can't feel any emotion coming off the screen and he's bored. Dance, Atredies Monkeys!!!PROTAGONIST OF THE STORY.
I take it you've only played the games lol.The Witcher is where they are pulling that bullshit, making all three characters equal protagonists in the story, rather than it being Geralt's story because "STRONG WOMEN" or whatever. We'll see how season 2 of that turns out as well.
Not at all; I even read the one he wrote after the fact years later. But you're missing my point about them making Yennefer an equal part of the story POV when the books are told from Cirilla's POV and Geralt's POV and most of the books are Geralt (and everyone else) chasing after Ciri and her doing things and trying to get away from her pursuers.I take it you've only played the games lol.
I think 3 was a great point. I had forgotten about the slowing down/shield thing completely (I’ve honestly forgot most everything other than the setting, spice, etc) and I think they could have easily just said a one liner during the fighting training in the beginning. “Concentrate on slowing down or you’ll never penetrate the shield.” Boom, done. Or maybe they did and I forgot that too!So I just saw this and I have some thoughts.
1. The cinematography was unreal. It was beautiful to look at the whole way through.
2. The sound editing was garbage. There was so much dialogue that got lost.
3. I know this might make me sound like a snob, but I really like how much you would miss if you don't know the books. Take the fight at the end, when Paul was fighting and kept slowing down at the kill moment. They asked "is he playing with me!?" But if you know the books, it's because he's used to fighting with shields, where you have to slow to get through the body shield. There were quite a few moments like that.
4. I'm glad they're not showing the worms more. Keeps building the tension. Kind of like Aliens.
5. They should have included more plot and character development, and fewer beautiful views.
I rather liked it. 4 out of 5. I'm excited for the next one.
I don't want a Dune movie to succeed for the sake of it being a Dune moviePeople saying the casual viewer with no book knowledge probably didn't like this, are really underestimating how much visuals will drive a movie. It was interesting, big in scale, had giant worms etc. General consensus was that people just enjoyed the movie.
It's far from perfect, but a 4 hr movie (which I'd strongly prefer) would never fucking sell. A lot of over-analyzing going on. After part II & III I'm hoping it will conclude with a very solid, AAA rendition - I am worried about zoomer Chani, not gonna lie.
I said it on literally page one, a lot of the stuff in dune is too booky to translate to the screen. Could some things have been better? Yes. Was it terrible? No. I stick by my 7/10.I don't want a Dune movie to succeed for the sake of it being a Dune movie
I want it to actually be good
What makes the dune books so good is all of the internal dialogue and thought processes. That does not translate well to the screen. You can't follow the books faithfully.