They shouldn't even do a part 2 film...Just go right into a 10 part series. Its a great spot to do that because you can use Paul's time in the desert to explore the politics of the Empire and the great houses, the religious stuff, and other aspects they glossed over, while also showing Paul learning/adapting in the desert.
I never read the books and I watched the original twice - once when I was a teenager and didn't understand shit, and once about a year ago. I read a little bit about the story in this thread before watching the original again and it made more sense.Im not sure how I feel honestly.
I think this is one of those movies you have to watch at least twice to fully gather your thoughts regarding what happened on screen in relation to the book.
If someone watched this movie and never read the book or heard about Dune do you think they would think it was a fantastic film on its own?
There is no debating the cinematography or visuals. Villeneuve has ascended into that rare movie stratosphere like Ridley Scott, Christopher Nolan, etc.
The original movie had a scene with a pilot/spacing guild monster thing that looked like the brain sucker from starship troopers. Did I miss it in the new movie or is it not in here?
A "navigator" i think?
Next question - Is Jessica one of the space jews that Chapelle was talking about?There is a line about how the spacing guild needs spice to navigate, but they aren't in the movie. (The big ship transporting all the other ships is operated by those things).
Its a big hole in the film given Guild Navigators are actually interfering/controlling shit more than even the Bene Gesserit.
Oh that's right.Longtime book reader here.
Loved the movie in IMAX. Visuals and scale 10/10. Overall rating 8/10.
Lots of story detail is loss but that's probably because of the 2.5 hour time limit. Maybe it was possible to add the extra details but that may have required too much exposition.
Oscar Isaac has a good face for Leto Atreides but he's still too much of a manlet. Rebecca Ferguson was great as Lady Jessica, definitely was too emotional but I think that was necessary for portraying her thoughts on-screen. The Liet Kynes character was butchered, however, not just racially but also his death.
I totally forgot about the differences in Kynes' deaths, although they try to at least get it in the ball park, don't they? I may be conflating Lynch movie and book but I thought Lynch was book accurate.A force that could rival the Sardaukar was one of the Emperor's biggest fears. It's why Count Fenring got spooked when Rabban mentioned possibly importing prisoners as laborers on Arrakis, because he knows where the Sardaukar come from.
Nope.Oh that's right.
I totally forgot about the differences in Kynes' deaths, although they try to at least get it in the ball park, don't they? I may be conflating Lynch movie and book but I thought Lynch was book accurate.
Fenring is who I was thinking of that gets introduced later, rather than Feyd.
I realize you are a purist but if you don't exclude the next two sentences, I am aware of Kynes book-accurate fate. The details not withstanding, what I meant was, in the broad scope of the story, that overall fate remains the same. The place and the fate.Nope.
In the movie the Empreror’s Sardaukar kill Kynes for betraying the Emperor. Hard to believe any Fremen would be caught off guard by the Sardaukar like it was shown.
In the book the Baron Harkonnen deceives the Sardaukar and has his Harkonnen men sabotage Kynes and leaves him to die in the desert.
The book death also portrays one of the book’s themes. The meeting of western science with natural world. While Kynes is lying the desert awaiting his death, he’s recalling the science of planetology taught to him by his father. Kynes love and knowledge about the planet doesn’t save him from the planet swallowing him up.
This 2.5hr movie felt like about 45 minutes.
I think they did actually label it Part 1 right at the beginning. I did not watch it in the theater, so maybe it was just on the format I watched.Saw it, loved it, no complaints - Having not seen the original or read the book in some years left me with alot of fuzzy spots i couldnt remember but came back while watching. They should have labelled it Dune Part 1 for those who were unaware it was going to be a multi-part movie story and not a half second pop up like they were trying to hide it lol
I think they did actually label it Part 1 right at the beginning. I did not watch it in the theater, so maybe it was just on the format I watched.
Oh no I saw it but maybe I was mid blink bc it seems like it was only on screen for less than a couple seconds before it faded away. It's also possible I was munching on the cookies I smuggled in.I think they did actually label it Part 1 right at the beginning. I did not watch it in the theater, so maybe it was just on the format I watched.
Man i'm not a picky person. I have one foolproof rating system on movies i personally like. Will i watch it again? I saw Dune today in the theater mostly to support the second movie being made. I didn't like it. Good cast, good visuals, terrible script. No reason for me to ever watch it again. Nothing compelling, no decent dialogue, not one scene that blew me away on any level. Complete waste of several great actors. I read the books as a teenager and liked the Lynch version better, despite being a campy,strange sometimes cringeworthy effort.
Literally nothing is better about this version, except it's modern filmmaking. Who writes these blockbusters? A book is source material for a movie not a script. Like it or hate it at least the first movie and the mini series had a honest to goodness real script. This movie like many others seems to be a pre-production story board of things happening without a script!
Rant over.