Thank you for helping me see the wrongness in my ways oh wise one. I will now ask for a refund.too early to tell where they will take this, but not too early to get your $100? a sucker says what?
Can't wait man. People are going to make incredible stuff with these tools.I can't wait to see the billion building posts on reddit or the likes to see what people create in this, ahh, I get excited looking at pre-alpha videos.
Is there a video/explanation on what you expect to get from EQ Land Mark?Gonna be making a super sweet hobbit hole first, then an Erudite Temple to Vazaelle in the style of Old Paineel. Then, once AI and MOBs are in I'm gonna make a twisting cave dungeon that is the innards of a giant fossilized crocodile thing. Would be super legit if it could be populated with MOBs so I hope they add that feature.
Have you looked at games like DOTA or TF2, both free games, both that the community creates content faster and better than the devs themselves.Okay, this is even more ridiculous than I thought: you PAY to get into alpha/beta early to create CONTENT for a FREE2PLAY game? Come on. EQ nostalgia gone too far.
Also, really, this new trend - trove e.g. - to let "the community" create content for your clueless developers is the new thing, right? This will work, if at all, only for a short period of time.
For now yes, Landmark will basically be creative mode Minecraft though you will have to gather the resources to build. No mobs, fighting, etc. At some indeterminate point in the future once they integrate combat and give the players access to the AI tools I can see a shit ton of possibilities for this game.Is there a video/explanation on what you expect to get from EQ Land Mark?
Is it just creative mode where you build things and... that's all?
Do you need to gather resources (at least some game there) or is it just infinite resources for you to create whatever you want?
That's the main point. Content we can make for ourselves. It doesn't have to fit what everyone likes especially here. I can play some old school but I also like the thought of getting my creative juices flowing and this game looks to be one way to do that. It's going to be interesting and that's more than I've heard from MMO developers in ages.Have you looked at games like DOTA or TF2, both free games, both that the community creates content faster and better than the devs themselves.
The whole point of landmark IS to create content so I don't understand why this is used as some type of argument.Okay, this is even more ridiculous than I thought: you PAY to get into alpha/beta early to create CONTENT for a FREE2PLAY game? Come on. EQ nostalgia gone too far.
Also, really, this new trend - trove e.g. - to let "the community" create content for your clueless developers is the new thing, right? This will work, if at all, only for a short period of time.
See i would weigh it completely different.I could be giving SEO too much credit, no I most definitely am, but it makes sense on at least one, and probably only one, level.
Testers that pay for access are invested to a point where they're going to buy and play the end game.
Therefore their input is already pretty valuable. They represent a part of the gaming community that is passionate about their game.
It's either a creative way to get passionate testers or a money grab that will end badly.
Time will tell.
I disagree. The people forking over cash now are going to be the ones supporting this game with more cash in the future. The people who are unwlling to spend cash now for whatever reasons they claim it's not worth spending are the same kind of people who won't spend any cash later or very little. From a business perspective im going to listen to the people willing to hand me money now before the game is even released.See i would weigh it completely different.
Their opinion on stuff doesnt count for jack shit they allready forked over their most prescious (cash) upfront. Who cares if theirs demands are matched now or in the future?
You need to please the ones who havent opened their wallets yet.
You want valuable testers? pick some shown true dedication not a Benjamin Franklin.
Its like taking high roller tipps from someone who has lost fortune at vegas allready claiming their next roll at the slot machine will net them millions.
That's totally false made up bullshit. Come on man. I'm willing to test games for free and if it's good I'll pay to play it. I'm NOT willing to pay a company to alpha/beta test their game on the hope it'll end up being good. That right there is simply foolish.I disagree. The people forking over cash now are going to be the ones supporting this game with more cash in the future. The people who are unwlling to spend cash now for whatever reasons they claim it's not worth spending are the same kind of people who won't spend any cash later or very little. From a business perspective im going to listen to the people willing to hand me money now before the game is even released.
Of course*I'm sure the guy that paid for alpha is going to report the bugged harvest node that yeilds more than it should...They will right?!