Rime
<Donor>
- 2,638
- 1,612
So is this gonna be fun or aids? I just want another new vegas.
I can promise you this will not be another New Vegas.
- 1
So is this gonna be fun or aids? I just want another new vegas.
I can promise you this will not be another New Vegas.
A friend of mine who is originally from West Virginia plotted the locations mentioned using Google Earth. The map, if they keep the scale, will be huge. The first blue square is the minimum for the locations he saw. The expanded square includes West Virginia University, so potentially we could have a map the size of West Virginia.
View attachment 168283
I am okay with this, but just don't have the time for MMOs much anymore.
I like co-op survival but have avoided Rust / etc. because I don't have time to be bothered with PvP / griefing at the same time (for PvP I'll play BR or League or something totally PvP) - I like the Fallout mainline games well enough but I'm kind of hopeful there'll be "blue" shards or something and I can co-op this, it sort of implies that'll be possible. Honestly the gameplay being fun is one of the biggest questions for me, it didn't look like a copy of FO4 but didn't look totally new either.
Hahaha hah... Yeah, no. They pretty much defined that corner of the marker, thus it's quite the opposite. Everyone hates any additional launcher. They (I) only tolerate it when the game is actually worth playing, which is nigh far and few between. You have to be Blizzard level to have your own launcher and have some semblance of success, which Destiny 2 and the latest Call of Duty are playable through. Try as they may, they won't replace Steam any time soon.It is likely to be Bethesda's breakout game, as they are currently only selling it through their website.
Fallout 76 Complete FAQ
It seems that Steam had better revise their business model, or get left in the dust by everybody and their brother by their own launchers.
The online aspect is a kick in the dick where that's concerned.
Not for Doom, E6 and Rage 2 if that’s what he meant.
However with the way things are headed, E6 could be online.
I think, and this might be just me talking out of my ass here, that them limiting the servers to 12-24 ppl will reduce the number of fucktards that are on each server.
Imagine you've got a server with the capacity of 2K, and a quarter of them are fucktards. That means that you'll have 500 fucktards all being fucktarded together, and as we all know.... Being fucktarded, breeds other fucktardedness. Here, what you'll have At the most, 5-7 (assuming that the top of the population cap is up near 30) people being fucktards.
The same goes for hackers, but I really feel that this game's woes will be over hackers.
*shrug* I guess we'll see.
Hahaha hah... Yeah, no. They pretty much defined that corner of the marker, thus it's quite the opposite. Everyone hates any additional launcher. They (I) only tolerate it when the game is actually worth playing, which is nigh far and few between. You have to be Blizzard level to have your own launcher and have some semblance of success, which Destiny 2 and the latest Call of Duty are playable through. Try as they may, they won't replace Steam any time soon.