The Ancient_sl
shitlord
- 7,386
- 16
I get 3 sick days a year.Confirmed advocate of presenteeism. Seriously though, what you say is partially true. However, it's less the coughing and spluttering that winds me up, but more the "Look at me! I could be at home sick, but I'm so devoted I came in anyway *sniffle sniffle*" nonsense. Coming into work while ill doesn't make you a martyr, it makes you a selfish ass who wants to boast at the end of the year "Look at me! I took no sick days this year."
Are you replying to Ancient and quoting me by mistake? Your question makes no sense.I get 3 sick days a year.
What do you think my workplace expects?
He's not my boss. Cross matrixed support.I want a job where I can call my boss " a fucking jackass" then then threaten to cut them up and still be employed.
You all are totally missing the (at least my) point. Its not 'calling in sick' and therefore having to 'take a sick day'.Yes, that's what I'm saying.
I know you're in the UK, where everyone works 30 hours a week and gets 14 weeks of leave a year, but things are a bit different here in the states. It goes along with what I said earlier in the thread - capitalism does not allow for this idea of health, because it doesn't benefit employers. They expect you to come in and work, because they're not paying you to sit at home sick. And since the majority of Americans quite simply can not afford to not get paid, we have what we have.
And you are totally missing the point that I wasn't talking to you.You all are totally missing the (at least my) point. Its not 'calling in sick' and therefore having to 'take a sick day'.
This is an environment (the one I'm talking about) where telecommuting is acceptable. So if you have the ability to telecommute, I would think that doing so when you're sick is a pretty fucking common sense idea. I said this in my very first post. If you have the ability to telecommute, and you're sick, stay the fuck home. This isn't rocket science. You lessen the risk of spreading it and you're in a more tranquil environment and have a better chance at a speedier recovery so you can come back faster.
Fine. Not you. BTM. Was the one that responded to my post and spawning the current debate.And you are totally missing the point that I wasn't talking to you.
No, he's providing an example.
Ahhh I see. Sickness policy differs dramatically between companies, never mind countries though. For instance, where I work now, we get 10 days or 5 instances (whichever comes first) of paid sick leave annually. That is the most generous allowance I've had ever, yet there are still people who feel the need to bring their sickness to work. I can understand though if you got a very limited number of days you might save them for when you were really ill, I would.Yes, that's what I'm saying.
Didn't read the thread, but, the flu vaccine is normally only 2-3 strains of the virus that are predicted to be in the outbreak. It could be a completely different strain. Not to mention, there's the difference between shifts and drifts.http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-18563_16...tbreak-widens/
Wondering how many here get flu shots. I never do, and never seem to get it.
But as you correctly pointed out it's a prediction, an educated one based on previous experience - regardless of antigenic drift and shift. We cannot guard ourselves 100% vs shifts or the rare drift which causes pandemics with the vaccination.Didn't read the thread, but, the flu vaccine is normally only 2-3 strains of the virus that are predicted to be in the outbreak. It could be a completely different strain. Not to mention, there's the difference between shifts and drifts.
I never said not to get it. I just said it was a prediction of what some of the strains that would show itself. I myself am required to get it due to working in the medical field. I think it would be stupid not to get it, lol.But as you correctly pointed out it's a prediction, an educated one based on previous experience - regardless of antigenic drift and shift. We cannot guard ourselves 100% vs shifts or the rare drift which causes pandemics with the vaccination.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Histori...luenza_vaccine
Cost-benefit wise it's a good idea to get the vaccine for the most vulnerable - the elderly, children, the pregnant, frequent overseas travelers and the immune suppressed to name a few.
Indeed. It's usually a good idea to not have those who care for the vulnerable spread the disease as well.I never said not to get it. I just said it was a prediction of what some of the strains that would show itself. I myself am required to get it due to working in the medical field. I think it would be stupid not to get it, lol.
I've always wondered about that. It seems intuitive to assume that when you're sneezing, running your nose all the damn place and generally being a pile of shit it spreads more, but all that stuff is just your body reacting to it. I'd love to know if the 'don't come to work if you're sick in order to prevent contaminating your colleagues' is based on science.I get annoyed at this "don't come to work sick" argument because nobody ever calls in sick for more than 1-2 days even though it's already been explained that they are contagious from before they have symptoms until they get over it.