No, what you have done is to pick a metric and scale that obscures the effect of vaccines compared to improvements in the availability and quality of medical care to the general population. Of course the death rates had been going down. Sick people were getting better treatment and died less often. This is an expected and good thing in a society with improving standards of living, and a separable causality from vaccination.
There isn't data going fully back to 1900, but here's measles reported cases per 100k (adjusts for effects of changing population size, which the first round of charts did not) back to 1920. Data wasn't even collected nationally in the US until 1912.
JFC, take this bullshit to the retard anti vaxxer thread Anti vaxxersYou're right. The measles outbreak in Washington is clearly the result of malnourishment.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/nati...ory.html?noredirect=on&utm_term=.60e146cfd59f
View attachment 194355
You're right. The measles outbreak in Washington is clearly the result of malnourishment.
We actually have some anti-vaxxers on this baord? Jesus fucking Christ. Hopefully all their kids get polio and they don't reproduce.
This is how sterile Google image searches have become. Search for something and it doesn't provide anything of the sort. Bing has been amazing, lately, save for their slow as aids overlay.
View attachment 194347
Yes, SafeSearch is off. Searching "porn" gives a very different result. In fact, gives near identical results to your own. You have Tracking turned off?Mine doesn't look like that, though it isn't particularly graphic. You sure you don't have SearchSafe enabled?
View attachment 194360
View attachment 194361