This was a textbook 2nd Amendment, pro-gun, NRA rhetoric, 'murica scenario.
Bad guy wants to inflict damage, good guys get him.
But it cost 2 people their lives.
For all the guns that NRA wants to put into more people's hands, someone who intends to do bad things will always get first blood, which means at least one innocent victim per incident.
And yesterday's shooting was a best-case scenario for that situation. that old man was lightning quick and a deadshot, and still 2 people died.
Is this the best that can be hoped for from a pro-gun perspective? 2+ deaths per random/puclic shooting that some whacko wants to partake in?
- 11
- 6
- 3