In the book wasn't there some point where it mentioned how they'd literally take anyone into the service? Like wheelchair bound, blind in two eyes dudes and just find some role for them even it it was medical testing (think that was the example the book used)? So it wasn't like everyone was Mobile Infantry right. Just making sure I'm remembering it right.No, in Starship Troopers (book and movie) the only path to having the right to vote and potentially run for public office, being a citizen instead of a civilian, was volunteering for a minimum of two years of military service. Though yes it was completely voluntary. Also you didn't actually get the right to vote until after your service was completed, so career military were only voting in retirement. Very different idea.
Correct and agreed. We need a system like this so, SO badly.In the book wasn't there some point where it mentioned how they'd literally take anyone into the service? Like wheelchair bound, blind in two eyes dudes and just find some role for them even it it was medical testing (think that was the example the book used)? So it wasn't like everyone was Mobile Infantry right. Just making sure I'm remembering it right.
Fuck that book was badass, "Something given has no value" is a line I think I'll always remember. The USMC has a bit of a hard on for the movie as well. "Just trying to kill some bugs Sir" was often used as an explanation for something dumb.
Relevant:In the book wasn't there some point where it mentioned how they'd literally take anyone into the service? Like wheelchair bound, blind in two eyes dudes and just find some role for them even it it was medical testing (think that was the example the book used)? So it wasn't like everyone was Mobile Infantry right. Just making sure I'm remembering it right.
Fuck that book was badass, "Something given has no value" is a line I think I'll always remember. The USMC has a bit of a hard on for the movie as well. "Just trying to kill some bugs Sir" was often used as an explanation for something dumb.
Let's outline some things here:
1) Starship Troopers was written as an extremely clever thought experiment, so much so that people with lots of letters after their names still debate over it to this day. Heinlein takes every opportunity to satirize each and every one of the points made in his own story. Multiple times it makes references to how pointless the ability to vote that one receives actually is, as your choices are one militaristic veteran or another.
2) We're not fighting a giant army of bugs. Our only remaining enemies are a figurative handful of people who live in caves, and we're literally going broke as a nation fighting them.
3) Any mandatory, domestic, civilian corps would cost a LOT of money. We already have the AmeriCorps, something conservatives love to defund despite sounding both patriotic and militaristic. And it also runs contrary to the founding capitalist principals of conservatism; that this kind of work (mostly infrastructure) are to be left to the free market, where profit motives create efficiency.
4) Therefore, this kind of program would actually be an example of EXTREME leftism in practice, ironic given that most of the proponents in this thread are identified conservatives.
5) Both the WW2 draft and the Veitnam drafts were liberal policies. The conservative answer to conscription has been to keep the poor as poor as possible, so that they will have to sign up for the military out of necessity, and then deny them any benefits of service as much as possible afterwards, ignoring the problems of rampant veteran unemployment and rarely sending their own kids to war.
1. ST was written as a novel to make money. Anything interesting about it is a reflection of Heinlein's philosophy that if he was interested in something, somebody else probably would be to and therefore would buy his book. Characters do not reflect the author's views on anything, they reflect the characters views. It wouldn't have been at all realistic to have book where everyone thought it was the best idea ever and signed up and as such the book probably would not have done as well. As for Heinlein himself, his only comment when asked about it was that he thought the society would probably do very well in the right circumstances, but that without experimental confirmation of at least a few generations it was just an opinion.Let's outline some things here:
1) Starship Troopers was written as an extremely clever thought experiment, so much so that people with lots of letters after their names still debate over it to this day. Heinlein takes every opportunity to satirize each and every one of the points made in his own story. Multiple times it makes references to how pointless the ability to vote that one receives actually is, as your choices are one militaristic veteran or another.
2) We're not fighting a giant army of bugs. Our only remaining enemies are a figurative handful of people who live in caves, and we're literally going broke as a nation fighting them.
3) Any mandatory, domestic, civilian corps would cost a LOT of money. We already have the AmeriCorps, something conservatives love to defund despite sounding both patriotic and militaristic. And it also runs contrary to the founding capitalist principals of conservatism; that this kind of work (mostly infrastructure) are to be left to the free market, where profit motives create efficiency.
4) Therefore, this kind of program would actually be an example of EXTREME leftism in practice, ironic given that most of the proponents in this thread are identified conservatives.
5) Both the WW2 draft and the Veitnam drafts were liberal policies. The conservative answer to conscription has been to keep the poor as poor as possible, so that they will have to sign up for the military out of necessity, and then deny them any benefits of service as much as possible afterwards, ignoring the problems of rampant veteran unemployment and rarely sending their own kids to war.