yes. you have to pick the hunter, because none of those options can stop the hunter from capping you instantly. its not even about the hunter killing your bears, or anything. its him killing YOU. its 100% a counter-pick.The hunter is the biggest threat to survival, so I'd pick the hunter and rats.
Oblig pic, new laptop
As you say, you have to take the hunter and rats. For the hawks, the hunter can help, but mostly what you do is lie flat and cover yourself with rats- If the hawks want to try to get at you the rats will be able to get at them. It wont be optimally efficient, but even at the most pessimistic you still have 5000+ rats after everything else is dead. Even if each hawk manages to make 20 successful attack runs before a rat manages to get a bite/grab on it the hawks are still doomed to defeat.yes. you have to pick the hunter, because none of those options can stop the hunter from capping you instantly. its not even about the hunter killing your bears, or anything. its him killing YOU. its 100% a counter-pick.
The next issue is the second choice. can it stop the rest of them from killing you. And, the answer there is probably no. Gorillas were my first choice, but then I was thinking in terms of group versus group. 5 gorillas could take 3 bears, etc... but then I realized, wait, those gorillas need to stop, 3 bears , 50 hawks, 10,000 rats, and lions, AND wolves, AND crocs... thats not happening.
10,000 rats is your best option for slowing them all down. even then, they'd not win, but might buy you enough time. the hunter also then might be able to help with the hawks, since he has a ranged weapon.