I don't think they're supposed to question the defendants right to remain silent. Or use evidence the judge had deemed impermissible.The prosecution is doing what the prosecution is supposed to do.
They are not supposed to go easy on kyle, they are also not there to find the truth. They are there to get a conviction.
Question for any lawyers here like Cad
Can Rittenhouse still sue all these media outlets for defamation even if he is found guilty?
What about the tweets from Biden, LeBron, etc? Are those sue-able in general?
I'd like to see this kid make hundreds of millions off of these vultures.
Question for the room in general: Does Rittenhouse have a better shot at success in politics if he spends time in jail, or if he gets off? What is better for his image long-term in the public consciousness? Thinking of a few leaders of the past here who spent time in jail and emerged exponentially more popular due to their martyrdom, like Mandela. If Kyle does go to jail, I hope when he gets out that people hoist him on their shoulders.
Obviously I hope that he gets off and that he makes an example out of every news outlet that slandered him.
Why do you always preface your opinion with “I pretty much am not sure or have any idea but here’s how I think it is.”I'm not an expert at Wisconsin laws, but it is my understanding that the law made posesion of firearms illegal by a minor as a baseline, and then they carved out exceptions, making it legal under certain circumstances.
What you guys are saying and the defense is saying is that even if kyle does not fall under any known exception, it is still legal for him to open carry his rifle as a minor in Wisconsin.
Which basically renders the law unapplicable.
If kyle doesn't fall under any exception then the top part should apply that states minors are not allowed to carry weapons.
I don't think they're supposed to question the defendants right to remain silent. Or use evidence the judge had deemed impermissible.
The prosecution is doing what the prosecution is supposed to do.
They are not supposed to go easy on kyle, they are also not there to find the truth. They are there to get a conviction.
It wasn't slander. Kyle was formally charged by a crime and put on trial.Question for any lawyers here like Cad
Can Rittenhouse still sue all these media outlets for defamation even if he is found guilty?
What about the tweets from Biden, LeBron, etc? Are those sue-able in general?
I'd like to see this kid make hundreds of millions off of these vultures.
Question for the room in general: Does Rittenhouse have a better shot at success in politics if he spends time in jail, or if he gets off? What is better for his image long-term in the public consciousness? Thinking of a few leaders of the past here who spent time in jail and emerged exponentially more popular due to their martyrdom, like Mandela. If Kyle does go to jail, I hope when he gets out that people hoist him on their shoulders.
Obviously I hope that he gets off and that he makes an example out of every news outlet that slandered him.
He was called a "white supremacist" by the PRESIDENT even though he never shot a single non white person.It wasn't slander. Kyle was formally charged by a crime and put on trial.
If they continue bad mouthing after he is found not guilty, then yes he has a case, but until then no, there is no slander.
Why do you always preface your opinion with “I pretty much am not sure or have any idea but here’s how I think it is.”
Cmon dude how do you show up with an opinion with Jack and shit to back it up. You go dude. Do it.
You watch your whore mouth. Don’t make me call DeSantis and have you deported.Because I'm not a stupid logger sucker like you.
I know very very little about Wisconsin gun laws, but I still have an opinion of my interpretation of it.
I think kyle does not fall under any exception so the overall limitation(or illegality) stands.
If the president called him that, then any reporting originating from that is 100% not slander.He was called a "white supremacist" by the PRESIDENT even though he never shot a single non white person.
You truly are dumb.
This is just not true. If someone makes an obviously slanderous comment, and you report on that comment, you are potentially committing slander yourself if you don't clearly identify it as such. You don't abrogate yourself from the law by simply saying the comment is someone else's content.If the president called him that, then any reporting originating from that is 100% not slander.
If you repeat something, is not slander, it is the first person who commits it, not the people reporting on it.
I'm going to SPACEThey got drones, satellites and vaccine passports on your spyphone, there is no more frontier, the West is dying. We can't run from tyrants anymore.
Me saying Joe biden called kyle a white supremacist is not a slanderous comment.This is just not true. If someone makes an obviously slanderous comment, and you report on that comment, you are potentially committing slander yourself if you don't clearly identify it as such. You don't abrogate yourself from the law by simply saying the comment is someone else's content.
Too many Matt Damon's in SPACE.I'm going to SPACE
Me saying Joe biden called kyle a white supremacist is not a slanderous comment.
It is an factual true statement. I'm not calling kyle a white supremacist I'm saying biden called him that. I'm not sure why are confused about this.
People reporting on biden's video from 1 year ago are not committing slander.
Lendarios: if you report on someone else slanderous comments you are not committing slander yourself.
Furry: that is not true. if you report on someone else slanderous comments you are not committing slander yourself.