You need 3 holdouts (one way or the other) to get a hung jury in this case.
I know. I just can’t help it. It’s god damn retarded.You're wasting your time arguing with some British cuck, any form of carrying a firearm is evil.
They could call in the Zimzam to protect the other oneIf that is their reasoning the judge should be in there lighting them up. The trial isn't about you motherfuckers. Also those 2 fucks flip a coin, winner gets Kyle with his AR on their roof for 3 months.
no, this is you
this is truly how low you are
at a party you see
and then you start to rape her, b/c why else would she be dressed like that? she asked for it.
that's your logic
Yeah I was wrong, criminal trials require unanimous verdicts. It's civil trials that have the 5/6ths standard.Really? I thought it took all of them get any verdict and anything less was a hung jury.
Wait, Jack is full of shit. Why would a US Marshal know anything about a state court case?
Wait, Jack is full of shit. Why would a US Marshal know anything about a state court case?
Isn’t the jury completely removed from everyone? Even the judge?
1/6th of 12 is 3?Yeah I was wrong, criminal trials require unanimous verdicts. It's civil trials that have the 5/6ths standard.
1/6th of 12 is 3?
1/6th is 2, if 2 people dissent you still have a 5/6ths majority. You need 3 dissenters to hang a 12 man jury in a civil trial.1/6th of 12 is 3?