I don't disagree with that, I'm just saying that there's no actual difference between the constitution and any other law than maybe a few more hoops to jump through to change it.
This is the best summary I've seen so far and it should be blindingly obvious to all. It's about intimidating ANYONE who dares to protect themselves, their families, their properties, their communities when BLM and Anti-Fa come marching, burning and looting. And the scary thing is, it'll probably work, too.
No shit bitch
She has probably spent $30K on dermatology
No shit bitch
She has probably spent $30K on dermatology
LOVING the spicy memes.
really hope the kid doesn't get fucked on some random thing.
I think there's almost no doubt he'll be found not guilty on all the major stuff, but I think he's going to be found guilty on reckless endangerment. I think that's going to be the "compromise" from the jury for "all sides".
I hate this. Because in reality, he should be not guilty on everything, but I just don't see that happening in the justice system in 2021. Juries in general are too tainted. I guarantee you some of these jurors are reading/watching trial stuff while not in the courtroom.
In this case specifically I don't know what would taint them, a kid being a kid?
I could see tainted AGAINST the state but against the kid? I would find that hard unless a person came in biased originally.
Reading shit like CNN or MSNBC's interpretation of testimony and then second guessing their initial thoughts while in the courtroom.
I always forget that people still believe "EXPERTS" on old MSM.