- 1,870
- 4,359
This is why I voted for you to win the Asshat award.Can you give me an example of the right doing this?
- 6
- 5
This is why I voted for you to win the Asshat award.Can you give me an example of the right doing this?
You are equating Ashli Babbit and her crime, at most, of trespassing to a career criminal drug dealer who spent a decade in prison?1/6 is the obvious example, now they're all peaceful protesters who did nothing wrong, being held as political prisoners. Elevating Babbit to martyr status also has direct parallels to the left elevating Floyd to martyr, both were criminals and do not deserve posthumous veneration.
Floyd was another big one, there was general outrage that Chauvin was even being tried at all. A "non-clown world" would have looked at Floyd's past serious criminal history and found an excuse to give Chauvin a slap on the wrist, he was considered to have done the world a great favor by removing Floyd from it.
I also provided the example of the SF illegal immigrant, I think his name was Garcia? Sure, leftism probably played a huge role in him getting off light, but that was the point.....left-wing tribalism ignores the facts of the case and gives their tribe a win, followed by the right blowing up over it. The exact opposite of what happened when rich white guy Brock Turner got a sweet deal, followed by left-wing outrage. This happened numerous times during the Trump years, this is one example. Some illegal would be accused of a serious crime, and a left-wing lawyer would agree to rep them pro bono for the publicity. The right would be generally outraged that the illegal was even receiving a trial at all, let alone a trial with a good, free lawyer. It was common to see calls for the illegal to simply be executed after being credibly accused while in illegal status.
1/6 is the obvious example, now they're all peaceful protesters who did nothing wrong, being held as political prisoners. Elevating Babbit to martyr status also has direct parallels to the left elevating Floyd to martyr, both were criminals and do not deserve posthumous veneration.
Floyd was another big one, there was general outrage that Chauvin was even being tried at all. A "non-clown world" would have looked at Floyd's past serious criminal history and found an excuse to give Chauvin a slap on the wrist, he was considered to have done the world a great favor by removing Floyd from it.
I also provided the example of the SF illegal immigrant, I think his name was Garcia? Sure, leftism probably played a huge role in him getting off light, but that was the point.....left-wing tribalism ignores the facts of the case and gives their tribe a win, followed by the right blowing up over it. The exact opposite of what happened when rich white guy Brock Turner got a sweet deal, followed by left-wing outrage. This happened numerous times during the Trump years, this is one example. Some illegal would be accused of a serious crime, and a left-wing lawyer would agree to rep them pro bono for the publicity. The right would be generally outraged that the illegal was even receiving a trial at all, let alone a trial with a good, free lawyer. It was common to see calls for the illegal to simply be executed after being credibly accused while in illegal status.
You are equating Ashli Babbit and her crime, at most, of trespassing to a career criminal drug dealer who spent a decade in prison?
In the end, its dichotomies like this which really are the epitome of our times. The Rittenhouse case exemplifies this, so does Babbit vs Floyd.
In the Rittenhouse case, the right is championing the very personification of what we should all hope for in our youth. A young man who has been gainfully employed since he was legally allowed to work. A man who worked to support his parents and his community, was never in trouble with the law and has already attempted to volunteer to serve his country (Joining up for the military).
Meanwhile, the left is defending someone who raped little boys, and someone who abuses women (Both convicted). Men who have spotty employment histories and have never been productive or stable, or served anything greater than themselves. They are beyond selfish in that they actively TAKE from the communities they live in, instead of providing.
And yet, on the MSM...its the latter who are the heroes who stood up to evil Rittenhouse. We're at a point where the left is so transparent in supporting a malignancy that if it were on a book people would criticize the author for his lack of subtly on how evil the "bad guy was".
Even someone as "far right" as Ted Cruz through the 1/6 protesters under the bus by calling them terrorists.
Meanwhile, look at what MAJOR news is saying about Rittenhouse. Look at what Democratic policy makers are saying before the trial has ended....
The only cure is more hugs.We've got to be able to cure one of you eventually
Convicted in an actual trial? No, but there weren't any high-profile right wingers that were convicted just for being right-wingers either.This is such a long-winded answer to actually NOT answer the question. Let's try again, and pay attention this time.
Can you sight an example of where a person who was actually innocent was found guilty simply because he was known to subscribe to left-wing ideology?
Please stop with this it was just trespassing bullshit. They were ramming at the barricaded gates to the House chamber calling for the heads of people inside.You are equating Ashli Babbit and her crime, at most, of trespassing to a career criminal drug dealer who spent a decade in prison?
So again you're using posts on a message board as an equivellent to the stated public opinions of both mainstream media pundits and major, national level politicians?
Like you understand there is a difference there right? Give me anyone in a major policy making position or a major publication which is 'trusted' enough to be published in say, Wikipedia, who has said the 1/6 protestors were peaceful protestors who did nothing wrong. Meanwhile, look at what MAJOR news is saying about Rittenhouse. Look at what Democratic policy makers are saying before the trial has ended....
If your argument is to say the zealots on the right are capable of this, sure--any ideologically controlled person is capable of twisting reality, hell--that IS what ideologically driven essentially means. The question I posed is...are those people IN CONTROL on the right, do they have control over major media, and policy? The answer is clearly no. Even people who are big time MAGA supporters shy away from embracing those dogmatic aspects. Yet on the left, those zealots are FIRMLY in control.
This isn't even getting into the context of the examples used. Like comparing Ashli Babbit, a woman who served her country all of her life vs a career criminal who did everything he could to disrupt and destroy his community.
The defense got wrecked today. His lawyers suck.
Sadly, I agree with you.
He has about .25 lawyers.
This kid is gunna get fucked on monday and I think we all know it.
The murder charge just isn't there but if he at a host of lesser charges it wouldn't be a surprise. I don't think I'd be surprised either if he walked on everything? I guess in my heart I don't really believe after George Zimmerman and after 2020 that someone is going to be exonerated in circumstances anywhere around ones like these.
Eh, even then, it's likely to be a "trickle" effect. So, most Americans will have the opinion of, "Well, it's not MY kid who had their heart assplode...".There's no conviction boogie on this. The only boogie with any legs at all is going to be one tied to people's kids and vaccine induced myocarditis + death.
$190k salary, usually $20-30k bonus
We also have lots of tech allowances, pay bar fees, parking, CLE... truly some golden handcuffs.
Prove it, provide links or shut the fuck up, fuck off, eat feces, and, in life's due coarse and to wholly natural causes at the age of 100+, die eventually like all living things do you bundle of sticks.I do read other MAGA-aligned sources. Most were very vocal about these issue