Rezz
Mr. Poopybutthole
- 4,488
- 3,531
Sylas, all of your "proof" relies on what we've seen and read. Except that we haven't seen or read about the dragons killing white walkers or the NK. So there is exactly as much evidence on both sides of the argument to say if the dragons are going to lolrape or the white walkers/NK are going to lol-rape: None.
You -like- the idea of the dragons being bullshit OP but have zero grounds to claim that they will be from any evidence in either the books or the show. Where has the proof been that the NK or the white walkers (almost nobody has mentioned the wights except to illustrate that they are scary to normal people but can be beaten with proper tactics) are vulnerable to fire? Specifically, the one white walker fighting Jon snow in the burning building seems to give zero fucks for the flame, and it visibly recoils from him. What evidence do we have that the dragon's fire is any different? There's none, in either the books or the show, aside from anecdotes at best. Point being, you're making a lot of claims and citing the show/books when the exact same claims (the NK/WW have no ability to fight the dragons) have the exact same amount of proof as the contrary claims (the dragons have no ability to fight the NK/WW) given the context within both the show and the books.
Look, I like dragons as much as the next guy, but you're pulling a lot of fan-fiction with zero basis in the written or produced works out of your ass and claiming them as facts. And even coming -close- to arguing "DEM" topics when the show is two seasons out and the books are two novels out is being completely ridiculous. Again, the simple fact that we've seen the NK or the WWs like 5-6 times combined tops, and the NK specifically has shown different powers in every scene? Means there's no DEM. And your definition of DEM does not apply to -either- argument, regardless how much you have settled upon your fan-fiction as being written/produced fact.
I loved the original title of this thread.
You -like- the idea of the dragons being bullshit OP but have zero grounds to claim that they will be from any evidence in either the books or the show. Where has the proof been that the NK or the white walkers (almost nobody has mentioned the wights except to illustrate that they are scary to normal people but can be beaten with proper tactics) are vulnerable to fire? Specifically, the one white walker fighting Jon snow in the burning building seems to give zero fucks for the flame, and it visibly recoils from him. What evidence do we have that the dragon's fire is any different? There's none, in either the books or the show, aside from anecdotes at best. Point being, you're making a lot of claims and citing the show/books when the exact same claims (the NK/WW have no ability to fight the dragons) have the exact same amount of proof as the contrary claims (the dragons have no ability to fight the NK/WW) given the context within both the show and the books.
Look, I like dragons as much as the next guy, but you're pulling a lot of fan-fiction with zero basis in the written or produced works out of your ass and claiming them as facts. And even coming -close- to arguing "DEM" topics when the show is two seasons out and the books are two novels out is being completely ridiculous. Again, the simple fact that we've seen the NK or the WWs like 5-6 times combined tops, and the NK specifically has shown different powers in every scene? Means there's no DEM. And your definition of DEM does not apply to -either- argument, regardless how much you have settled upon your fan-fiction as being written/produced fact.
I loved the original title of this thread.