It'll be interesting how they deal with that. Mormont was exiled after he uncovered that Arstan was Barristan Selmy. At that point Barristan tells Dany that Mormont was put there to spy on her. I wonder how the show is going to explain why Barristan didn't come right out and tell Dany about Mormont and if Dany is going to be cool with that answer (will have to be I guess).Why hasn't Mormont been exiled yet? Wasn't he already exiled in the books at this point? I really hope they don't gloss over that shit because it was pretty important. In fact, I don't remember Barristan telling Daenerys about Mormont at all or Mormont telling her about Barristan.
I could be pulling an astrocreep right now and I'm sorry.
That stuff was so boring in the books that I forgot... FUUUUUCK don't use that nicknameNot until after they take Mereen, Astronoodle.
The only issue is the plausibility of it as far as Dany is concerned (most on here don't care for Dany so I wouldn't expect that many to give a shit anyway). In the book the reason Selmy doesn't reveal his identity is to earn trust with her. In the show his identity is already known but I guess he's still building trust before he tells her that there is a spy that is reporting her movements all this time.Jorah and Barristan will argue in front of Dany, Jorah lets something slip that he shouldn't know, gets called on it and revealed. Wont be an issue IMO.
Jaime being reviled as the kingslayer never made much sense to me. You'd think that between the shit everyone put up with with the mad king, all the anti-Targaryen sentiment from everyone in power and the power of the Lannisters to shape public belief Jaime would walk out of there as the hero who valiantly saved thousands of lives by sacrificing his oaths. The shit he takes just seems contrived to me.Nah, that is the truth. Jaime is a great swordfighter, but he hasn't done much. He sat out Robert's Rebellion because Aerys wanted him in King's Landing as a hostage to keep Tywin loyal. The North led the way during the Greyjoy Revolt. The only thing that needs to be written down is how he lost to Robb Stark in battle.
Well, look at a lot of the Japanese philosophies of old. For certain cultures, honor is > all.Jaime being reviled as the kingslayer never made much sense to me. You'd think that between the shit everyone put up with with the mad king, all the anti-Targaryen sentiment from everyone in power and the power of the Lannisters to shape public belief Jaime would walk out of there as the hero who valiantly saved thousands of lives by sacrificing his oaths. The shit he takes just seems contrived to me.
Its the culture of the show, as Kirun said honor > all. Breaking an oath is punishable by death, the mad king being mad is probably what spared Jamie's life. The mad king burned Ned Stark's sister alive and Ned still referred to Jamie has kingslayer/oathbreaker and despised him for it.Jaime being reviled as the kingslayer never made much sense to me. You'd think that between the shit everyone put up with with the mad king, all the anti-Targaryen sentiment from everyone in power and the power of the Lannisters to shape public belief Jaime would walk out of there as the hero who valiantly saved thousands of lives by sacrificing his oaths. The shit he takes just seems contrived to me.
Burned his father alive.The mad king burned Ned Stark's sister alive and Ned still referred to Jamie has kingslayer/oathbreaker and despised him for it.
Exactly this.he did the right thing but he took the action of killing the mad king on his own.and he was his protector.Its the culture of the show, as Kirun said honor > all. Breaking an oath is punishable by death, the mad king being mad is probably what spared Jamie's life. The mad king burned Ned Stark's sister alive and Ned still referred to Jamie has kingslayer/oathbreaker and despised him for it.