Lanx
<Prior Amod>
2 hours just to make eggs? The fuck?Tried some eggs this morning @ 146 for a little over 2 hours and the unattached whites were still pretty slippery and delicious. I guess you will need a higher temperature or perhaps a quick-boil like in that link to really dial in the perfect eggs.
Before I gag, I want to make sure we are talking about the same thing.I love over-medium when i am making a sammich to take to work. You don't want to be in your finery and have runny yolk all over you, like a peasant.
It's these sous-vide crazies. 2 hours to make an egg instead of 5 minutes...4 hours to cook a steak instead of 5-7 minutes of searing on a grill.2 hours just to make eggs? The fuck?
I think what the primary argument against doing eggs in the morning like that means you need to get up two hours before you want to eat them to get them going. Which if you are cooking breakfast for 20 people or something is totally worth the time difference (arguably) but for yourself or 2-5 other people, you're looking at like maybe 10-15 minutes combined prep/cooking/cleanup.
Also, the steak argument isn't that great, as you are taking pretty similar amounts of effort if you are cooking 4 steaks of different temperatures. You'll get them to whatever the lowest temp is, and then finish each one for varying amounts of time, meaning you're only saving the 7 minutes (and leaving them in for well over an hour prior) of watching them hit the lowest temperature before playing with them on the grill/in the pan.
For many of the items listed that are being sous vide'd, the process makes sense to a degree. But for doing a couple of eggs or a group of steaks steaks of varying temperatures, the process isn't really good for it. Much like the statements about doing a thin piece of fish such as tilapia in the bath, the time you save is miniscule because the finishing process with a torch is almost enough by itself to cook the fish.
You can probably sous vide literally everything, but some items just don't make sense to do so.