This is the man who thinks the two Amazing Spider-Man movies are masterpieces that are perfectly loyal to the comics.We were nitpicking about The Avengers gaping plot holes right after it came out, we didn't wait until now.
No, only a few people were whining about plot holes. All the rest of us were going on about how great The Avengers was. Still is, actually.We were nitpicking about The Avengers gaping plot holes right after it came out, we didn't wait until now.
GOTG can't even touch the Avengers toes, it's not even in the same league. But yeah people get sand up in their vagina at the slightest hint of criticism.We were nitpicking about The Avengers gaping plot holes right after it came out, we didn't wait until now.
Your opinion is bad and you should feel bad for it.GOTG can't even touch the Avengers toes, it's not even in the same league. But yeah people get sand up in their vagina at the slightest hint of criticism.
Geez, it's a movie based on a comic book! That should clue you in thatthe good guys are going to win. Sure, they might kill off a hero or two, for a little while, but the good guysalwayswin in the end. So that's not why you go to see the movie. You go to seehowthe good guys win. The bigger the threat, the more interesting the plan is to beat the big bad. Marvel writers know this, which is why it's not that big of a deal if the big bad comes off as an underdeveloped ancillary character. They're not the draw, it's their threat that is the draw.The only big problem with GotG, which is the same problem every single Marvel movie has, is that every Villain is really just a non thought out secondary character with no chance of winning.
You're right, and I knew it going in and it didn't spoil the movie because I really enjoyed it. Maybe my point is that originally authentic fantasy is like any genre of movie that is authentic. Not only does it look and feel awesome, but it pulls you emotionally as well. Sin City and the Watchmen come to mind, where you would totally love to see a dozen spinoffs but the hero just gets destroyed in a way that makes the movie 5x better than a generic "beat the bad guy of the day" routine.Geez, it's a movie based on a comic book! That should clue you in thatthe good guys are going to win. Sure, they might kill off a hero or two, for a little while, but the good guysalwayswin in the end. So that's not why you go to see the movie. You go to seehowthe good guys win. The bigger the threat, the more interesting the plan is to beat the big bad. Marvel writers know this, which is why it's not that big of a deal if the big bad comes off as an underdeveloped ancillary character. They're not the draw, it's their threat that is the draw.
The only difference with the MCU films is that Thanos is actually being developed as a character. Very slowly. Very methodically. By the time it comes for them to take Thanos on you should be invested in that character because they've spent fifteen movies developing him, or whatever number Avengers 3 ends up.
I'd like to see both in their own movie.So, who did you like better, Groot or Rocket?
You are basically correct. The issue lies within the concept of limited series vs. ongoing franchises. Spiderman? Yeah, he is isn't going to die in a Spiderman film. But Rorshach totally can in a limited issue series, because after that who gives a fuck? He's not spiderman going through 300+ issues, he's Rorshach going through a small realm of stories. -Any- comic book story that doesn't have a finite end (ie, a limited series or a one-shot or something similar) is going to have very little threat to the main character. The drama isn't the threat; it is how Spiderman deals with the perceived threat. Extrapolate for other Comic Book heroes and you have every story ever.You're right, and I knew it going in and it didn't spoil the movie because I really enjoyed it. Maybe my point is that originally authentic fantasy is like any genre of movie that is authentic. Not only does it look and feel awesome, but it pulls you emotionally as well. Sin City and the Watchmen come to mind, where you would totally love to see a dozen spinoffs but the hero just gets destroyed in a way that makes the movie 5x better than a generic "beat the bad guy of the day" routine.
I'm not going to argue that The Watchmen was a better movie than the good Marvel movies, I'm not trolling here, but give me a moment in ANY marvel movie as emotionally gripping as when Dr. Manhattan kills Rorschach. It's a moment where the purity of all these heroes just simply cannot exist together and one of them must be destroyed. The complexity of the relationships surpass anything Marvel will ever put out.
Thanks for reminding me. Right in the feels.I'm not going to argue that The Watchmen was a better movie than the good Marvel movies, I'm not trolling here, but give me a moment in ANY marvel movie as emotionally gripping as when Dr. Manhattan kills Rorschach. It's a moment where the purity of all these heroes just simply cannot exist together and one of them must be destroyed. The complexity of the relationships surpass anything Marvel will ever put out.
DESTROY THE FALSE PROPHET!I'm getting a vaporware vibe.
One year from release and that's the best they can show us.
August 2016 is a more likely release date.
This turns out not to be the case.The Rock would have been a better choice for Drax.