Of course it will be. It's Guardians. They don't fail.Looks real good.
I'd guess "all of the above" honestly.
Pacman. which was refed in the previous movie. Which was partially a source for Among us.
Green instead of pink though.
suit designs are heavy on 2001 as noted.
Yeah I think maybe she was sick of hours in the makeup chair and they just painting it on now.Nebula looks like crap, and I love Karen Gillan. Hopefully it's something they fix with the remaining post production time.
The trailer looks solid. Adam Warlock still looks bad.
Nebula looks like crap, and I love Karen Gillan. Hopefully it's something they fix with the remaining post production time.
The trailer looks solid. Adam Warlock still looks bad.
well, from what i've heard... i don't have any specific source, just random youtubers who've talked about it... but i guess dave specifically asked to wear a shirt because it's getting harder and harder for him to stay in shape at his age. he's still huge, just he's not going the HGH route that the rock is going, so he has the muscle mass, but not the definition.They also made Drax wear clothes and Peter less He-man adjacent... Equality...?
There's a difference between not being sexualized, and turning a female's curves into a box shaped abomination.i don't know, man... nebula has never been a sexual character, at least in the movies. i'm completely unfamiliar with her in the comics. gamora is at least a love interest, so there should be some level of sexualization to her. but mantis and nebula aren't sexual characters. they aren't love interests to anyone. keran gillan and pom klementieff are smokeshows, no doubt, but there's nothing sexual about their characters. same as, honestly, most other characters in the guardians movies.
i mean... i get it... it's a very unflattering picture... but nebula is like 99% metal already. personally i've never really had a thing for karen gillan anyway so i'm not really offended by it, but i get itThere's a difference between not being sexualized, and turning a female's curves into a box shaped abomination.
after ant man 3 apparently is very mediocre i'm massively lowering expectations for this one, and will only go to theaters if reviewers i trust say its decent. there is some hope i guess since its Gunn & his crew and lets face it Ant Man 2 was pretty mediocre too so no big surprise
social media hype is meaningless, there was lots of early hype for ant man 3 and kang but look how that turned out. its gonna be really funny if DCU reboot turns out better than marvel phase 5
most of that looks like garbage so far. The writer for Avengers: Kang Dynasty wrote Ant Man 3 and the writer for Secret Wars wrote Dr Strange 2 so those 2 movies may be garbage too, sad
after ant man 3 apparently is very mediocre i'm massively lowering expectations for this one, and will only go to theaters if reviewers i trust say its decent. there is some hope i guess since its Gunn & his crew and lets face it Ant Man 2 was pretty mediocre too so no big surprise
social media hype is meaningless, there was lots of early hype for ant man 3 and kang but look how that turned out. its gonna be really funny if DCU reboot turns out better than marvel phase 5
most of that looks like garbage so far. The writer for Avengers: Kang Dynasty wrote Ant Man 3 and the writer for Secret Wars wrote Dr Strange 2 so those 2 movies may be garbage too, sad
well, from what i've heard... i don't have any specific source, just random youtubers who've talked about it... but i guess dave specifically asked to wear a shirt because it's getting harder and harder for him to stay in shape at his age. he's still huge, just he's not going the HGH route that the rock is going, so he has the muscle mass, but not the definition.
also, with chris pratt, the shot in the first one with his shirt off, that was a marvel mandate i think, not a james gunn thing. every marvel hero has to have the muscley panning shot, as silly as it is (yet they get crap for showing females in a sexy pose). i think gunn has been trying to get away from that kind of stuff for a while. i actually don't ever remember a james gunn film (outside of said chris pratt shot) that had any kind of emphasis on shots like that. he always tries to make those scene goofy. check peacemaker for reference