I am going to be undergoing some ACL / MCL / PCL reconstruction in the next couple of weeks. I have never had a significant surgery in my life before. When I was in the ER they referred me to Twin Cities Orthopedics, which seems like a good place. They have taken care of me well (as far as I can tell) so far. I have seen three of their doctors escalating their specialty each time (Knee / Shoulder Guy > ACL Guy > Multi Ligament guy).
He seems like a good guy so far, friendlier than the second doctor, seems to know his stuff and sports medicine, etc.
I also have a second (fourth?) opinion tomorrow with the surgeon that my physical trainer 'strongly recommends'. I am not sure if I am reading too much into her saying 'strongly recommends' or not. Does that mean she has just worked with the other surgeon before? That she had a bad experience with the other doctor and isn't naming names? Who knows.
Regardless, I sent each doctor a series of questions asking the basics on # of reconstructions they have done, success / failure / complication rate, infection / revision / reinjury rate and am pending those answers. I pretty much have analysis paralysis at the moment. This is a huge deal for me as it is going to play a huge factor in returning to a sport that has changed my life (and my knee) in so many ways.
How in the holy hell does someone completely unqualified to make the decision select a surgeon?
EDIT: Also, I hope this is a general health issues thread.