Hearthstone

Valishar

Molten Core Raider
766
424
I guess my main question is, which class legs really aren't necessary to be competitive?
Rogue legendaires aren't necessary with oil rogue, Vancleef is just "okay" and I'll probably just cut him eventually.

Hunter legendaries aren't necessary at all.

Antonidus is optional in mech and tempo mage.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,434
53,897
Yeah I'd say oil rogue lists are about 50/50 whether they include VC or not. I have him so I usually run him, but if you don't have him you certainly don't need to craft him.
 

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
You don't need to craft any class legendaries to be "competitive". I'd say the most necessary ones for their respective classes areTirionand Grommash.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,434
53,897
I've played control warrior before I had Grom. It really wasn't competitive. Although you can sometimes win without drawing him, control warrior really needs that big finisher.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,434
53,897
That's a good counter argument. The earlier OTK lists did run Grom, it's only the latest list that Neirea put together than didn't run him. It's also generous to call it a competitive deck. Neirea took it to legend during the early GVG days when the meta was still a mess, but in the current meta OTK is terrible. I mean if we're going to list previously viable decks, aggro war took the meta by storm for awhile, but the meta has evolved to the point that aggro war is unplayably bad.

The only consistently playable warrior deck is wallet warrior, and it loses a lot without Grom.
 

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
I agree that if you want to take a warrior or paladin to legendary you really should have Tirion or Grommash. If you want to hit rank 10 you can do that with whatever the fuck you want.

I never know what someone means when they say "competitively". Some people just want to get past rank 20.
 

Tol_sl

shitlord
759
0
How much does Tirion swing games for you guys? I started playing pally recently and am using sunwalker as a ghetto substitute. I have like 2200 dust, but I'm missing a few commonly used ones like ragnaros, harrison, alex and geddon. My gut keeps telling me to craft rag since he pops up so often, but eh...guess I should probably wait and see how BRM shakes out.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
How much does Tirion swing games for you guys? I started playing pally recently and am using sunwalker as a ghetto substitute. I have like 2200 dust, but I'm missing a few commonly used ones like ragnaros, harrison, alex and geddon. My gut keeps telling me to craft rag since he pops up so often, but eh...guess I should probably wait and see how BRM shakes out.
6/6 with Divine Shield and a 5/3 Weapon when he gets killed - he blows games wide open at times.
 

The Master

Bronze Squire
2,084
2
Barring some kind of Divine Favor super agro Paladin (which is a fun deck, though not good) Tirion is almost the only reason you see Paladin at the top tiers of ladder. So if you actually want to really play Paladin a lot, craft a Tirion. But class legendaries are only worth crafting if you want to play the class a lot or already have the good neutral ones. So if you're just testing the class out because it is new to you, don't worry about it.
 

Tol_sl

shitlord
759
0
I've dabbled with paladin but mostly just play it for dailies right now, usually hovering between rank 10 and 15 with it using my sunwalker fill-in. I guess I was just curious what people thought of tirion because I always see him mentioned as near mandatory for paladins and I've been really tempted to craft him lately. I have a bunch of other class legendaries (Voljin, Cenarius) that I feel that while they're rad, I could replace them if need be, so I was just kind of curious.

I'm in a place where I have a handful of "complete" decks, but am still missing a lot of the big neutral legionaries and I get crippled by indecision every time I save enough to craft a new one, haha.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
I guarantee you dont see paladins during prime time, thats all midnight shit.

Face Hunter just destroys any of there decks. Tirion?? You wont even make it that far
 

Morrow

Trakanon Raider
3,341
948
The same way you knew it'd be good without having seen the other cards, you don't form your opinion based on the other cards since you don't know them. With the current knowledge, it's garbage other than gimmicky priest deck which probably still wouldn't use it over stormwind chargers so you can actually kill someone in one turn with all your spells.

Egg also looks pretty bad, but assuming the Whelps count as dragons, it might actually fit in a BRM new type deck.

Rend looks nice enough but require a dragon deck, and the stats are pretty garbage. The fact it can remove legendaries like Tyrion, Antonidas or the 4attack dragons(assuming they become relevant again due to dragon decks) over BGH is kinda nice. Especially interesting for a class with no good removal like Druid.
Rend is pretty bad thus far, but if we get a few more cards like Azure Drake, it won't toooo terrible. Shame it's so expensive tho. I can see classes with no hard removal potentially running it.
 

Neph_sl

shitlord
1,635
0
Rend already has only 4 hp, why not remove the dragon condition from his battlecry?

edit: Quick comparison: Rend Blackhand is 7 mana for 8/4 if you have a dragon in hand, destroy a legendary minion. The Black Knight is 6 mana for 4/5 destroy an enemy minion with taunt. So I guess you can target your own legendary minion with Rend, but that seems silly.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
The value to 8 power is quite a big jump from 4...

Looking at druid cards for Druid of the Claw (Taunt) vs. the 8/8 Treant aren't that far apart in stats besides a similar attack bump - (both taunt, +4 attack, +2 HP). And the cost difference is 3, probably one of which goes towards HP.

Assuming they consider "Destroy a Legendary" equivalent to "Destroy a Taunter" in mana cost, he should still likely cost 8 in line with the attack bump. So the minor restriction in having a Dragon in hand probably keeps the cost on him at 7 rather than 8.
 

Angelwatch

Trakanon Raider
3,053
133
His attack power is meaningless. All it does is ensure that he kills the chillwind yeti that runs into him.

My problem with Rend is that he's expensive and has very low health. It's the same reason Nesingwary sucks. Finally the list of legendarys you want to kill with him are very limited. Right now some of the most effective decks don't run any legendaries (face hunter) or just 1 or 2 as finishers like Antonidas or Leeroy.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,434
53,897
Eh, the meta should slow down a bit for about a month as people experiment before it speeds back up as people go back to the mathematically superior aggro decks. During that month pretty much anything goes and you'll see a lot of ultra greedy control decks floating around.

Rend will probably still be bad, but the meta will be pretty dramatically different for that first month.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
His attack power is meaningless. All it does is ensure that he kills the chillwind yeti that runs into him.

My problem with Rend is that he's expensive and has very low health. It's the same reason Nesingwary sucks. Finally the list of legendarys you want to kill with him are very limited. Right now some of the most effective decks don't run any legendaries (face hunter) or just 1 or 2 as finishers like Antonidas or Leeroy.
Don't get me wrong. I don't think he's good. But I think their reasoning for why he's costed as he is (including the reveal a Dragon clause) can be easily understood.

I think he'll be far too narrow to use 90% of the time and that his low HP makes him a waste of deck space - but I can see why he's costed as he is, etc. - if he had decent toughness he'd probably be 8 or 9 mana without the reveal a dragon clause.
 

Ravishing

Uninspiring Title
<Bronze Donator>
8,456
3,577
Obviously he can only be used in a Dragon themed deck which means a lot of decks won't even need to worry about the choice of including him.

Do I think he'll make an appearance in most Dragon themed decks? Yes.

A dragon themed deck will presumably have a lot of large minions. An 8/4 might be easy to remove on his own but could pose a problem if your opponent is running low on resources or he will just soak up removal that would have targeted one of your dragons.

He's obviously useless for a good majority of decks but he'll have his place for sure.
 

The Ancient_sl

shitlord
7,386
16
4 health is trivial to remove from the board for every class but the one that doesn't bother to run legendaries. His very conditional special ability can be accomplished by cheaper means, I don't think even after the meta shakes loose he'll be seen much.