Hearthstone

Attog

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,496
1,930
I don't think I can play the fully combo version of patron warrior until they get a way for us to disable animations. I cannot get the combo off without roping and ending the turn most of the time.
 

Gavinmad

Mr. Poopybutthole
44,438
53,906
That list is two months old, here's a newer one. And no you don't pull Emperor from a combo deck you fucking mong.

Zalae_Patron_Warrior.png
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
All I need to do is grind out for my Death's Bites and I will be running Patron Warrior until my eyes bleed. I did it a little this morning and just found the mechanics/combos fun.

Senfglas #1 Legend Grim Patron Warrior - Hearthstone Decks

This is what I am going with so far. I think I just went 2x on the 1x while I wait on Death's Bite. I don't know that I will keep Emp in there though.
You can change it depending on what's out there. Can make it more defensive by adding one brawl, and one shield block.

You don't sound like you are to experienced with this game yet tho so I would just stick with that list and read his tutorial.
 

Famm

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
11,041
794
I see categories for tavern brawl #x on most of the netdeck sites now, so people who do netdeck certainly have access to brawl netdecks.
Those aren't up right away though. He's right, when that brawl first when up I loaded in with a rogue deck full of nothing but spells. I got some guy playing standard midrange paladin and kicked his ass because I actually played to the brawl. Still, its not that they are dumb per se, they just want to be spoon fed and hand held. If Blizz introduced something like challengestone then the playerbase would learn and get better at making/teching decks for it.

Be honest, most all of us "netdeck" at least to a degree if we want to climb ranks at all. Most everything on the ladder past around 17 any given month is your standard templates with some single card deviations here and there. The majority of players aren't going to break through with a new archetype, they just use what's been proven and who can blame them.
 

a_skeleton_03

<Banned>
29,948
29,765
That list is two months old, here's a newer one. And no you don't pull Emperor from a combo deck you fucking mong.

Zalae_Patron_Warrior.png
Firewall blocks that pic I will look at it when I get home and try it.

The few matches I did never really made it past turn 6 is probably why I didn't see the benefit of emp, yet.

You can change it depending on what's out there. Can make it more defensive by adding one brawl, and one shield block.

You don't sound like you are to experienced with this game yet tho so I would just stick with that list and read his tutorial.
Yeah I played at launch a decent bit but not since then. I will follow it for now.
 

Vaclav

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
12,650
877
a_skeleton_03:
Inner Rage x2
Execute x2
Whirlwind x2
Fiery War Axe x2
Battle Rage x2
Slam x2
Armorsmith x2
Unstable Ghoul
Shield Block x2
Acolyte of Pain x2
Frothing Berserker x2
Warsong Commander x2
Death's Bite x2
Gnomish Inventor x2
Grim Patron x2
Emperor Thaurissan

[For the record, I think I'd disagree with the Fiery War Axe x2 myself and swap it for Taskmaster - but that's just me]
 

Northerner

N00b
921
9
FWA is fantastic early on if you draw it but the nice bonus for the card is that it can replace a death's bite on demand and trigger the rattle.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
[For the record, I think I'd disagree with the Fiery War Axe x2 myself and swap it for Taskmaster - but that's just me]
You need Fiery to race agro. There's some interchangeable cards imo, but that is not one of them due to how many agro decks are out there.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Nah, I think it's perfect.Can only double whirlwind it not triple like you can do right now with Bite, and it only gains power by getting damaged itself.

And it's not so nerfed that it becomes unplayable.

I would even say it could still be a 3 mana 2/4 because the best you can buff it to is 8 attack.
 

Northerner

N00b
921
9
Well, it isn't really very playable at 2/3 +1attack when damaged for 3. It would be for 2 or at 2/4 or even 2/5 for 3 perhaps. At least the flesheating ghoul activates off other cards and that doesn't see constructed play.

I'm fine with whatever nerfs it though. Patron is an annoying deck no matter what but it is the frothers that actually just make people rage. I like the idea of just nerfing them with charge though.
 

Krag

Peasant
475
47
With that text change there's really no reason to reduce the health I think, since they are still fairly easy to kill once they have taken damage. It could even gain +1 attack both when it takes damage and when it deals damage so it can trade somewhat decently early on like it can now.
 

Famm

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
11,041
794
I would play Raging Worgen over that garbage. Pretty sure everyone else would too.
Yeah the fact that it doesn't gain from other damage makes it essentially unplayable in any forseeable archetype, patron or otherwise. That's the only thing making the card strong. Worgen would indeed be better for patron if they nerfed frothing that hard. You could easily get eight attack out of a warsonged worgen and of course the chance for more with inner rage.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Worgen would be exactly 8 with inner rage, and task master, and it would have to have no blockers to do it's 16.

I'm fine with any of that to be honest.

Patron needs a change, and they need to do it before this new xpac comes out because nothing is going to change with it dominating the ladders the way it is.