Hearthstone

Mures

Blackwing Lair Raider
4,014
511
See, I don't get that. I play the same deck minus two fel reavers and I don't have nearly the wins I should(based on what I read here). I have an extra mech yeti and shredder instead. I mean, it's possible I suck. Yeah, that's likely it. I probably don't put nearly the amount of effort into mulliganing that I should. I'm pretty happy if I get a decent mana curve on my mulligan. Every time I've tried mulliganing for a specific card like undertaker or glaivezooka, I just end up fucking my curve.
That deck posted a little while back isn't face hunter, 4 mana yetis, 5 mana fel reavers, and the like are much too slow for face hunter.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
See, I don't get that. I play the same deck minus two fel reavers and I don't have nearly the wins I should(based on what I read here). I have an extra mech yeti and shredder instead. I mean, it's possible I suck. Yeah, that's likely it. I probably don't put nearly the amount of effort into mulliganing that I should. I'm pretty happy if I get a decent mana curve on my mulligan. Every time I've tried mulliganing for a specific card like undertaker or glaivezooka, I just end up fucking my curve.
Dont play that deck use Reyands version of cancer. Just mulligan for undertaker and all his buffers

That deck is insanely powerful
 

TheBeagle

JunkiesNetwork Donor
9,138
32,059
I've found Hearthstone to be a lot like online poker in the sense that I shouldn't ever play on tilt. It's fucking hard, but after getting a bad beat it's just best to turn it off for an hour or so and calm down before getting impatient and dropping 3 or 4 ranks.
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
17,184
8,195
I thought the midrange hunter deck, while still based around undertaker, but containing fel reavers and savanahs and such, was performing better than face hunter. Brainless face hunter is still better? Ugh.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Yeah, but the mid range is more fun imho.

Undertaker is just too good in cancer, and there's no deck that can easily deal with it.
Before you would see allot of control warriors out there, but now since they have gone out of the meta abit cancer is just plowing through everything.


That's why I hope they put the tournament mode in soon because that's a whole different way to play constructed.
 

AngryGerbil

Poet Warrior
<Donor>
17,781
25,897
Because of the hero power, the slower Hunters more often lose to the faster mirror of themselves so they are by definition an unstable strategy.
 

The Master

Bronze Squire
2,084
2
I thought the midrange hunter deck, while still based around undertaker, but containing fel reavers and savanahs and such, was performing better than face hunter. Brainless face hunter is still better? Ugh.
The problem with Reynad's deck is that everyone is running BGH. I've run into Zoo running BGH. Some people are running TWO BGHs. Second problem is that in the Hunter mirror, faster deck had the advantage in the life race. So Reynad's list is worse in the mirror and worse against control.... why would you run it?
 

Deathwing

<Bronze Donator>
17,184
8,195
Don't know, thought it was doing well based on what I read here. I don't play constructed enough to get an accurate personal sample size of which deck is better. When I play has a bigger influence, easily.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
is that everyone is running BGH. I've run into Zoo running BGH. Some people are running TWO BGHs
Which is pretty terrible considering the meta right now is fast hunter. If you have two BGH's in your deck you might as well just concede when he lays that first undertaker down
 

Man0warr

Molten Core Raider
2,265
171
And you lose to every cancer deck out there. You've just made yourself as slow as humanly possible
No? My deck is basically Cancer hunter without Wolf Riders and Golems. It's no worse than 50/50 and a lot of times I have the exact same start as them.

Trade off is I have actual top decks once my board has been cleared vs Control/Midrange decks.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
Don't know, thought it was doing well based on what I read here. I don't play constructed enough to get an accurate personal sample size of which deck is better. When I play has a bigger influence, easily.
It's one of the problems with constructed ladder, and why some prefer to play arena only.

If you look at the most dominate decks in every season of hearthstone they are all pretty brain dead decks.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
No? My deck is basically Cancer hunter without Wolf Riders and Golems. It's no worse than 50/50 and a lot of times I have the exact same start as them.
Its way worse. You won't be able to keep up with them because there sole purpose in the mid game is play a card so they can play hero power.
 

Angelwatch

Trakanon Raider
3,053
133
There have been times where the game has been less fun than at other times. I think that this is, truly, the least fun it's ever been though. I could rant on but it's best not to.
 

Mist

REEEEeyore
<Rickshaw Potatoes>
31,800
24,478
Anyone know of a good Warrior midrange deck? I'm grinding arena hardcore at the moment for cards. Other than one epic fail of 2-3 I've been averaging 7 wins.
 

Column_sl

shitlord
9,833
7
There have been times where the game has been less fun than at other times. I think that this is, truly, the least fun it's ever been though. I could rant on but it's best not to.
.
Well not sure what your reasons are, but for me it just comes down to I've already done the Legendary grind 3 times, and Arena is the only other mode they offer.

When they put in tournament mode I think I will like it more then ever.