Strong misread of the room comrade
Nah, reading the room just fine.
Just waiting for the inevitable "its not what you say, its HOW you say it!" moaning and crying
Strong misread of the room comrade
Hmmm, that's pretty good. What's their year end discount usually? It's typically around the end of December IIRC, isn't it?
[...] longer than you can stay insolvent.
I hate that my play on a small caps counter trend move would likely correspond with arkk performance.Cathie Wood's Ark Invest has destroyed $14 billion in wealth over the past decade, Morningstar says
"These funds managed to lose value for shareholders even during a generally bullish market," Morningstar analyst Amy Arnott said.finance.yahoo.com
“Great minds think alike”…I hate that my play on a small caps counter trend move would likely correspond with arkk performance.
On this I would disagree because I see these news items are being one of a number of variables that pushes sentiment. Are people seeing it on Bloomberg, seeing it get talked about on social media and CNBC and thinking "Apple is rebounding in China, time to buy"?I would pay little heed to news items they are meaningless.
Seems logical but I don't think humans tend to handle emotions in that way. It's a cart and a horse argument. When I'm in good spirits I put less weight on the negative, when I'm in bad spirits I put more weight on the negative, and vice versa. Now think about the markets behavior, when it's going up people will say "It's ignoring the bad news!" when the markets mood is sour the bad news suddenly matters again. It's why things seem to ebb and flow in what "Moves markets" The sentiment is the driver not the news. The sentiment determines how we will process the news.On this I would disagree because I see these news items are being one of a number of variables that pushes sentiment. Are people seeing it on Bloomberg, seeing it get talked about on social media and CNBC and thinking "Apple is rebounding in China, time to buy"?
Now if you are saying this stuff doesn't impact institutional investor sentiment, then that I can get behind. But I think it can and does impact retail investors to a degree.
I know. We were discussing AAPL in the trough and I was adding on those low dips across the bottom during that time. We are in agreement of the result but perhaps not as much in terms of the why. Or maybe also the why but we might have taken a slightly different route getting there. End result is we saw the same buying opportunity and those who took advantage made some shekels. I have said many times, the market is funny because there are multiple ways to win. It doesn't really matter the root cause of the why, what matters is we all saw something and acted and for either the same or different reasons we were all right.I was also just trading Apple from a technical and sentiment perspective (as I PM'd you about Sanrith Descartes ). The stock was getting beaten up, but eventually found a pretty strong demand level of support around 169-170. Beyond that, I still had a level at of support165 I added to. You had a long period of March - May where it kept thitting that 169 level and getting bought up. Then you had repeated negative news hitting that entire period as well and no matter what, held that support. We had a few days where it tested that backstop of 165 and then, as Blazin pointed out, the sellers got exhausted and any remotely "not negative news" gave it reason to move. Long term hold for me too.
View attachment 530491