Investing General Discussion

Furry

Email Loading Please Wait
<Gold Donor>
23,383
31,171
I rate the close to the week a B. Could have been better could have been a lot worse . Bull goals next week crush the shit out of the vix reduce daily vol, stair step higher . Low of the week needs to be >5200.

my general lean is that we are in a bear market .
All That Magic GIF by Nickelodeon
 
  • 1Jonesing
Reactions: 1 user

Kithani

Blackwing Lair Raider
1,356
1,734
I rate the close to the week a B. Could have been better could have been a lot worse . Bull goals next week crush the shit out of the vix reduce daily vol, stair step higher . Low of the week needs to be >5200.

my general lean is that we are in a bear market .
Oh My God GIF by South Park
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,395
37,248
I certainly hope we aren’t. If the market gets back on top of the 200d that will tell us something.

nothing good happens below the 200d which will soon be descending.

even if it’s a bear that doesn’t mean it has to be Armageddon but also means the low is not likely in.

even emotionally I’m torn on this , bears are nice they allow 2+ years of good returns not really worrying about markets.

to clarify it would be a cyclical bear not a secular bear so a lost 6-14 months not a lost decade
 
  • 3Like
Reactions: 2 users

Borzak

Silver Baron of the Realm
26,518
35,309
You say gold is illiquid, but countries deal in gold reserves still to this day. It's just become unpegged from the currency valuation directly due to FIAT currency becoming en vogue. For instance : In China, they have a lot of gold in the ground, but don't have a lot of companies that are great at extracting it. They will allow external companies to come in and extract/refine gold. But there's one catch. They have to sell all gold they extract to the Chinese government (they get paid market value it seems). China has been accumulating gold for a while. They just might also be shifting their T bills into that as well now.

This would help them if the eventuality of a BRICS reserve currency comes to pass in the way it's been spoken of. Which would be as a reserve currency backed by as assortment of assets reserves.

One of the reasons various people and groups have asked for an audit of Fort Knox is not just is the gold actually there, but who owns it. Meaning what if any thing did the US use as a guarantee or collateral, or whatever else that someone else might have partial ownership of some of the gold.
 

Haus

I am Big Balls!
<Silver Donator>
14,637
58,611
One of the reasons various people and groups have asked for an audit of Fort Knox is not just is the gold actually there, but who owns it. Meaning what if any thing did the US use as a guarantee or collateral, or whatever else that someone else might have partial ownership of some of the gold.
It's KNOWN that other have partial ownership of the gold reserves. It was one of the things about us becoming the reserve currency had somehow also involved many countries storing gold with us. There was just a news article about rumblings that Germany might request something like 120 tons of it back or somesuch.
 

Tide27

Bronze Baronet of the Realm
2,030
9,349
One of the reasons various people and groups have asked for an audit of Fort Knox is not just is the gold actually there, but who owns it. Meaning what if any thing did the US use as a guarantee or collateral, or whatever else that someone else might have partial ownership of some of the gold.
I dont think we will ever know the truth about Ft. Knox. Supposedly our money supply is backed by the gold standard. If it was ever to get out that Ft. Knox is actually empty, it would cause a global monetary crisis in my opinion.

If I remember correctly, the last time there was even a partial audit was in the 1970s, and even then it was just a tiny fraction audited, not the entire place.

Seems quite suspect that out entire monetary supply is based off of a gold standard, and yet no one really knows if it exists or not.

Its almost like religion. As long as people believe it exists, then it must be true and people have faith it is still there. Seeing just how our govt has been corrupted and robbed the American people over the past decade or so gives me pause to think it actually is still there.
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Gold Donor>
46,663
130,994
I dont think we will ever know the truth about Ft. Knox. Supposedly our money supply is backed by the gold standard. If it was ever to get out that Ft. Knox is actually empty, it would cause a global monetary crisis in my opinion.

If I remember correctly, the last time there was even a partial audit was in the 1970s, and even then it was just a tiny fraction audited, not the entire place.

Seems quite suspect that out entire monetary supply is based off of a gold standard, and yet no one really knows if it exists or not.

Its almost like religion. As long as people believe it exists, then it must be true and people have faith it is still there. Seeing just how our govt has been corrupted and robbed the American people over the past decade or so gives me pause to think it actually is still there.
Schrödinger's gold?
 
  • 1Jonesing
Reactions: 1 user

Lambourne

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
3,121
7,325
It's KNOWN that other have partial ownership of the gold reserves. It was one of the things about us becoming the reserve currency had somehow also involved many countries storing gold with us. There was just a news article about rumblings that Germany might request something like 120 tons of it back or somesuch.

Most of the foreign country's reserves are held at the Federal Reserve of New York. Bank of England also holds many countries' reserves. Dutch central bank is quite open about where it stores its gold, 1/3rd is inside the country and the rest is spread between NY Fed, Ottawa and London.

I think it makes sense for any country to store some of its gold elsewhere. Ultimately what it's there for is to sell to another country in times of crisis and if your gold is already in a country not party to a conflict you may find yourself in you can just transfer ownership there.

If an adversary drops a nuke on Ft Knox, it would make the area inaccessible to humans due to fallout even if the vault isn't destroyed. A bunch of gold you can't trade because you can't get to it doesn't do you much good.

NY Fed was at open to tours until recently. They have some real Scrooge McDuck energy going on there. Access tunnel is a 90 ton revolving door.

1744441276556.png
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Borzak

Silver Baron of the Realm
26,518
35,309
It would be hard to get rid of the Fort Knox gold physically. The amount of gold pushed onto the market would cause issues in the gold market. Not only that the physical gold in Fort Knox is not "investment quality" grade wise meaning it would have to be melted down and refined to match investment grade gold and then be sold. It's gold but not the same % of gold that an American Eage is. So it comes down to who owns what in Fort Knox mostly.
 
Last edited:

Asshat Foler

Log Wizard
<Gold Donor>
48,829
40,154
I certainly hope we aren’t. If the market gets back on top of the 200d that will tell us something.

nothing good happens below the 200d which will soon be descending.

even if it’s a bear that doesn’t mean it has to be Armageddon but also means the low is not likely in.

even emotionally I’m torn on this , bears are nice they allow 2+ years of good returns not really worrying about markets.

to clarify it would be a cyclical bear not a secular bear so a lost 6-14 months not a lost decade
Do you mind clarifying what you mean of 2+ years of good returns not really worrying about markets? Are you referring to the market after the bear market ends?
 

Blazin

Creative Title
<Nazi Janitors>
7,395
37,248
Do you mind clarifying what you mean of 2+ years of good returns not really worrying about markets? Are you referring to the market after the bear market ends?
Yes, now don’t get me wrong traders will be full of worry but in reality there is little worry in a strong uptrend . Traders tend to fear a revisit to the lows any day now , all while it climbs away from them .

especially in the beginning because markets turn upwards around the time news is at its worst so people think it’s wrong and are too afraid to get in .

it’s not rocket surgery, want price above moving averages , you want the long term averages to be curling up and you want the ma’s stacked from shortest to longest . When that happens get long and enjoy the ride and cut out the noise
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Jysin

Ahn'Qiraj Raider
6,770
4,888
That is definitely a positive start. My fear is the upcoming earnings season kicking off next week. We are likely to get a ton of pulled guidance. Aka more uncertainty.

All of that said, I am quite long on the markets already from the lows. Happy to sit and watch it chop S&P 5300 for a while and try to find a base. I really hope we aren't going to see lows again, as that is going to get a lot more panic and fear roiling markets.

While volatility is great as a day trader, this extreme range is exhausting. Seen a lot of dumb traders playing options without stops get absolutely blown the fuck up last week. Even crazier to me is people holding options overnight. The headline risk is insane. Getting trapped in options overnight (or a weekend like this) after a big headline hits and being stuck until market open is just unacceptable risk.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user