Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.Though I will say TRIT had some extraneous circumstances surrounding its precipitous fall. It had just started moving upwards too.
Citadel has quite a bit of silver holdings, could it have been a honey pot all along?
I ate a pair of 12.5 puts because I didn't close a 0.1 contract on expiration day ...... never againTell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.
Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.
So just from reading the last few pages:
1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).
What did I get wrong?
Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.
Assuming you have at least 100 shares, sell covered calls above your cost basis and make some cash while you wait. its IV is still really high and you can get back to zero pretty quick. I would sell the 15's and lose the dime over the 12.5, but selling the 12.5 if you can get 40 cents is solid.Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.
I feel your pain.I ate a pair of 12.5 puts because I didn't close a 0.1 contract on expiration day ...... never again
Basically correct. There is a ton of really good info on SPACs in this thread that would be worth reading if you intend to dip your toe in the water.So just from reading the last few pages:
1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).
What did I get wrong?
So just from reading the last few pages:
1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).
What did I get wrong?
So just from reading the last few pages:
1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).
What did I get wrong?
I keep thinking about getting back in because I love the fundamental concept of the company. Its the potential fraud part that stops me.I have zero basis in my remaining TRIT
Just trying to assuage my sad from profits getting shook out of my paper hands
So just from reading the last few pages:
1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).
What did I get wrong?
I sold my THCB in early hours for 24, dipped to 22 already. It'll go up and down through out the day and I feel it'll trade along with the other big EV plays like NGA/RMO/STPK/CCII etcDoes not take nearly as long as 2 years. And you got to decide for yourself when to sell, but anytime after 30 percent is fine. Some do very well post merger (LAZR, HIMS, QS, etc)
I have to decide what to do with THCB now. I'm up well over 100 percent (bought in November, and that was considerded a "very long hold" in the spac world by the way). Is microvast the next QS (stock went to over 100 after merger..)??
This is the game we are playing.
All I will say is anytime you are over 100% profit on a SPAC you REALLY need to examine your due diligence on the company and see if it justifies holding it further.Does not take nearly as long as 2 years. And you got to decide for yourself when to sell, but anytime after 30 percent is fine. Some do very well post merger (LAZR, HIMS, QS, etc)
I have to decide what to do with THCB now. I'm up well over 100 percent (bought in November, and that was considerded a "very long hold" in the spac world by the way). Is microvast the next QS (stock went to over 100 after merger..)??
This is the game we are playing.