Investing General Discussion

  • Guest, it's time once again for the massively important and exciting FoH Asshat Tournament!



    Go here and give us your nominations!
    Who's been the biggest Asshat in the last year? Give us your worst ones!

Jackie Treehorn

<Gold Donor>
2,908
7,481
Citadel has quite a bit of silver holdings, could it have been a honey pot all along?



This has been all over the socials for a few days now. People have been saying to stop buying SLV and buy PSLV and others instead (and physical.)

Check out ASM this morning.
 

Rajaah

Honorable Member
<Gold Donor>
12,520
16,542
Nevermind, it's fixed now. I'm selling Blackberry today and putting it into QQQ and SAII.
 
Last edited:

Arden

Blackwing Lair Raider
2,732
2,055
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?
 
  • 4Like
Reactions: 3 users

Locnar

<Bronze Donator>
2,821
3,132
Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.

I doubled down. Just think if the law suites get thrown out? mooooon

This week should be interesting, like a lot here I am loading more on spacs and dollar cost averaging on shit that dropped.

Also Cruises are ALMOST within range of me jumping back into them. They were a early play for me last year that I got out of (along with airlines) at the first big "vaccine 95 percent effective!" announcement. Airlines have not fallen enough for me, not enough swing back up for them for me to tie money up with.
 

Jackie Treehorn

<Gold Donor>
2,908
7,481
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?

That’s about the jist of it.
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,543
120,805
Tell me about it, I'm stuck at $11.10.
Assuming you have at least 100 shares, sell covered calls above your cost basis and make some cash while you wait. its IV is still really high and you can get back to zero pretty quick. I would sell the 15's and lose the dime over the 12.5, but selling the 12.5 if you can get 40 cents is solid.

1612187146620.png
 
  • 2Like
Reactions: 1 users

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,543
120,805
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?
Basically correct. There is a ton of really good info on SPACs in this thread that would be worth reading if you intend to dip your toe in the water.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Fogel

Mr. Poopybutthole
13,141
52,054
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?

For point #5, spacs have 2 years to find a company to buy, after they they dissolve the company and give you your 10$ back. The good spacs usually don't make it past a year before they have the first announcement/rumor
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Locnar

<Bronze Donator>
2,821
3,132
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?

Does not take nearly as long as 2 years. And you got to decide for yourself when to sell, but anytime after 30 percent is fine. Some do very well post merger (LAZR, HIMS, QS, etc)

I have to decide what to do with THCB now. I'm up well over 100 percent (bought in November, and that was considerded a "very long hold" in the spac world by the way). Is microvast the next QS (stock went to over 100 after merger..)??

This is the game we are playing.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,543
120,805
I have zero basis in my remaining TRIT

Just trying to assuage my sad from profits getting shook out of my paper hands
I keep thinking about getting back in because I love the fundamental concept of the company. Its the potential fraud part that stops me.
 
  • 1Like
Reactions: 1 user

Loser Araysar

Chief Russia Reporter. Stock Pals CEO. Head of AI.
<Gold Donor>
80,145
160,353
So just from reading the last few pages:

1. SPACs are shell companies that exist to fund a merger or acquisition.
2. The have a floor of about 10$.
3. When the rumor that the SPAC has been attached to a good merger or acquisition hits, the SPAC can surge 20%+.
4. When it surges, you sell before the actual merger/acquisition.
5. All of this usually takes place in a predetermined window of time (2 years maybe?).
6. We should be targeting SPACs that have reputable managers (not sure the best way to figure that out).

What did I get wrong?

You didnt get anything wrong.

Thats the whole game.

I guess it can take up 2 years but my timelines for exiting and entering are more like 2 months max. Also, i look for it to hit $25+/share before i cash out, i think that as close to the ceiling (with decent trading volume to unload your position easily) as you can get. So it should be more like a 100% return assuming you bought in low teens than a 20% return
 

Fogel

Mr. Poopybutthole
13,141
52,054
Does not take nearly as long as 2 years. And you got to decide for yourself when to sell, but anytime after 30 percent is fine. Some do very well post merger (LAZR, HIMS, QS, etc)

I have to decide what to do with THCB now. I'm up well over 100 percent (bought in November, and that was considerded a "very long hold" in the spac world by the way). Is microvast the next QS (stock went to over 100 after merger..)??

This is the game we are playing.
I sold my THCB in early hours for 24, dipped to 22 already. It'll go up and down through out the day and I feel it'll trade along with the other big EV plays like NGA/RMO/STPK/CCII etc
 

Sanrith Descartes

You have insufficient privileges to reply here.
<Aristocrat╭ರ_•́>
44,543
120,805
Does not take nearly as long as 2 years. And you got to decide for yourself when to sell, but anytime after 30 percent is fine. Some do very well post merger (LAZR, HIMS, QS, etc)

I have to decide what to do with THCB now. I'm up well over 100 percent (bought in November, and that was considerded a "very long hold" in the spac world by the way). Is microvast the next QS (stock went to over 100 after merger..)??

This is the game we are playing.
All I will say is anytime you are over 100% profit on a SPAC you REALLY need to examine your due diligence on the company and see if it justifies holding it further.