Ambiturner
Ssraeszha Raider
- 16,117
- 19,682
You're missing the point entirely. It's a great movie because it had subtext. That subtext could have been about anything. The reason why the sequels can't compare is because they lack anything beyond the surface. That's why they feel shallow and forgettable. This is stuff your brain picks up subconsciously, so the fact you aren't even aware of it kinda proves the point.
No, I'm not.
Jurassic Park was huge because it was revolutionary special effects wise. The story was mostly irrelevant and just had to not suck. It's not some great lesson in storytelling.
Even if it was, the dangers of man playing god and the idea that "life finds a way" (even though that's complete bullshit) would still be 100x more relevant than that reluctant father bullshit
- 3
- 2