You're using loaded words like"stalking". He was just walking down the street on the phone. With police. And he stopped following Martin, and Martin was almost home, then turned around and instigated a physical confrontation with Zimmerman.
I have lived in cities most of my life, also. I've been followed. I've been beaten. But I have never once thought "I got away from that guy who was following me. Let me turn around and fuck him up because I'm scared." Never once.
If I was walking down my street tonight and someone was following me at a distance, I would continue quickly to my house. If they stopped following me, I would be grateful. Then I would go home and not get shot in the fucking chest.
Great, so you know what it feels like to be filled with a rush of adrenalin. When I feel threatened I get on edge immediately, it's a natural reaction. Personally I've done stupid things like hit someone first, I'm only human, shit happens. Drinking a little too much, the above mentioned adrenalin rush, it can lead to doing stupid things. Should I have been killed because I struck the first blow? Certainly not. I was absolutely responsible for initiating the physical part of the altercation but I wasn't fully and completely responsible for it. If it was escalated to the point of a death then I would accept my responsibility in what happened.
I do fully agree that Zimmerman had every right to defend himself but the fact remains that he played a role in starting the altercation. As such in my view he shares in the fault for what happened. It doesn't matter who threw the first punch or fired the first shot. Both Martin and Zimmerman played a part in what happened and they both share the responsibility and fault.
If it is a fact that Martin followed and attacked Zimmerman as he was going back to his vehicle then that's wrong of course. But does that make him the only one at fault? Not in my book. He was unable to control his emotions, which as I said above can be difficult even for a level-headed person like me, but that doesn't mean that he is now solely responsible for everything else that happened.
Poster Abefroman is very reasonable in what he was saying. Things escalated and got out of control. It doesn't matter what the reason for the escalation was and we don't know. Was Zimmerman harassing and stalking Martin? Did Martin return the stalking behavior and attack Zimmerman? Who cares. None of that changes the fact that both of them played their own part in the altercation.
You don't just get a magical reset button after you initiate an altercation.
If I were being followed and I felt threatened my blood would be pumping furiously. I would be filled with a rush of adrenalin. My mind would be thinking, "What do I do? What do I do??" I would be going through my natural fight-or-flight response. I would be trying to stay calm and collected. There would be a great deal of things happening to me in a short amount of time, it isn't an easy situation to be in. Would I go and attack the person? It's hard to say, perhaps I would if I felt that was my best defense. I don't really know.
Either way the fact remains that both of these people were responsible for what happened. Martin is deceased, Zimmerman was beaten, nobody wins. They should both be punished if we are a fair and just society. They are both responsible for the escalation of violence in the altercation. Zimmerman with first following and harassing Martin, Martin for initiating the physical portion of the altercation, Zimmerman for firing the gunshot. None of these things are right.