Blackyce
Silver Knight of the Realm
- 836
- 12
As much as I'd like to, we can't touch freedom of speech/press. People/organizations should be able to say whatever they want. We need to learn/educate on bias, propaganda, and stop buying into the conglomerate news sources. It's really the only way to go. A good way to start is to read several independent local/community publications (traditional or internet) rather than the 24 hour entertainment sources. For people too caught up in their own little worlds, this will never happen.So instead of those 4 major conglomerates you're going to get 50 small ones who'll magically start reporting fair and unbiased news? Somehow I don't think that's going to make a huge difference. Small media companies can be just as corrupt as big ones. In fact, I live where this is a reality.
Its like, they pump information in my head to force me to feel, man. But I don't wanna feel like they want me to feel.are you me.
Tell it to Reader's Digest.I am reminded now of a Megadeath song.
Freedom of the press does not exempt them from rules governing monopolies. Though the enforcement of said laws have been a joke across the board, including in media ownership.As much as I'd like to, we can't touch freedom of speech/press.
For the most part you only really have two different viewpoints in the US anyway. That won't change just because you downsize companies.No.
But by so many different viewpoints being expressed, you will be able to weed out the most biased ones and hopefully come to a greater understanding of the facts surrounding various issues.
There's no way to fully separate the news from opinion.
Hungary tried to limit lobbyists from large corporations buying politicians in their constitution. Their EU overlords wasn't pleased so they had to change it back. Sums up globalization nicely.impact would be different and regional.
i am starting to reject globalization somehow....thinking small rather than thinking big is my preferred option..
Either they were hoping no one understood the system so they could spin it to make it look the way they want or the dude was clueless. But the chick was savvy enough to bust them on the bullshit.I don't have a Twitter, so I have no idea how that shit works, but it sounds like he was trying to imply that people Twitter was suggesting she follow were actually people she was following?
I don't either but that's what it seems like. I have 4 friends on FB and 0 status updates, and it's always asking me, Do you know these people???...Sounds like that's what it was.I don't have a Twitter, so I have no idea how that shit works, but it sounds like he was trying to imply that people Twitter was suggesting she follow were actually people she was following?
Definitely disagree.For the most part you only really have two different viewpoints in the US anyway. That won't change just because you downsize companies.
Except, you're still not explaining why journalists all of a sudden would develop a large variety of rational viewpoints, just that they would. Who can honestly say after thinking about it for more than ten seconds that journalists somehow will go from making up racist stories out of nothing to being fair and unbiased just because you downsize media companies? Maybe it would make sense if your world view is that evil men at the top dictates the discourse in society. How about looking into what kind of people are choosing to become journalists instead? Who knows, you might actually find a real explanation for their propaganda.Definitely disagree.
That perception on your part is...one of the symptoms of the disease a nice round of trust busting would perform as chemotherapy for, actually.