When did I say I didn't find Zimmerman's story credible?
Like I said repeatedly, there is zero proof that Zimmerman attacked first. There is also zero proof that Martin attacked first.
Zimmerman's story is proof of nothing. Nothing. What people heard, what the medical examiners observed, what has been recorded, what the clothing stains show: all of these count as proof that either support or refute Zimmerman's story. No proof exists to show who started the fight. It simply doesn't exist. Because it doesn't exist, we have no choice but to find Zimmerman innocent (which is the way it should be). It doesn't mean Zimmerman proved he didn't attack first, it means it couldn't be proven that hedid, which is all that matters.