a retcon is a retcon. and most can easily be handwaved as unreliable narrator when you do one.^That. Remember the Suuko and Aang episode where they went to find a Dragon as a shortcut to mastering Firebending? To "learn from the source" as it were. And you saw the original avatar, who was briefly as acknowledged as being a badass Firebender by the guys he was fighting, training with something that looked basically like a Dragon. Also Toph's Earthbending is unique because she literally learned from the Badger Moles. They based her entire style off an entirely different martial art to give it a distinct feel from every other Earthbender. So that is a modern day example of real talent being refined by learning the motions from animals.
Plus, you know, 10,000 years, myths and legends, etc. What we've heard prior to this is how people in the present, ~9,900 years later, know about how bending started. That is basically what people in the 17th century knew about the exact origins of agriculture and the transition from hunter-gather societies. Now we are getting a first hand account of what actually went down.
All-in-all, for a kids shows, Avatar has amazingly little retconning. The mechanics and lore of the world hang together very well. I can't think of a TV show essentially in its fifth season on air right now with fewer narrative fuck ups.
Legend of Korra fits in after all of this. It is the sequel to "Avatar: The Last Airbender".and where this Legend of Korra serie fits into it ?
It's not a retcon at all though. They said in the original the Dragon Spirits "taught us how to fire bend". Notice what the hunters said after he was trained by the dragon? "The way he usedfire, it's like an extension of himself." At no point did they say the dragons gave them the ability to actually use fire. They simply taught them the techniques to do it proficiently, IE bending. And that's what that Episode with Zuko and Ang even showed. The dragons didn't teach them super fire bending, them taught them techniques to control it better.a retcon is a retcon. and most can easily be handwaved as unreliable narrator when you do one.
Anyway, it can even be further explained by a likely cataclysm. Avatar timeline is like 20k years. Wan was asserted for being just under 10k for "modern" avatar.
Compare it to human history. 8000BC. we were literally living in caves. Agriculture is just invented. Pottery. The utter lack of progress from Wan's time to Aang's time is crazy. particularly when you go 70 years from Aang, to industrial revolution in Korra.
You have evidence of abandoned civilizations. the library, the dragon temple/city. the dragonturtles themselves leaving.
Because politics, Avatar is supposed to bring peace and balance, not murder anyone that crosses her path. Killing leaders would just bring chaos and she can't be the omnipresent world police. He is also one of the few people who know stuff about spirits and those seem to be the bigger threat at the moment.So, caught the origin Episodes and decided to start with the series. Got the end of the Civil War two part. What I don't get is why the Avatar is pussy footing around her uncle. We've pretty clearly been shown that the Avatar ranks above the spiritual lords of the respective realms, here.
Do they explain later why she just doesn't Avatar state and smack her uncle down, and tell him he's going to jail or some shit? Because Roku did not have a problem with taking out the Firelord, despite being a fire citizen. So it doesn't seem like it's taboo if someone is corrupt. I guess it could be explained with her being young and not yet a full established Avatar, but at the moment it feels a little contrived--like the only reason she isn't going Super Sayjin and nuking him is because the plot needs it.
Still, despite that, it's very enjoyable--and even that small contrivance is easy to overlook because they've really brought out Korra's inexperience and naivety, so even though it feels more like a plot consideration, it's not totally outside the realm of believability.